Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Dutchboy88
55% McCain, 43% Obama - Weekly mass-attending Catholics
55% McCain, 44% Obama - Non-evangelical Protestant
54% McCain, 45% Obama - Protestants
52% McCain, 47% Obama - White "regular-mass-attending" Catholics


46% McCain, 53% Obama - Protestant/Other Christian
46% McCain, 53% Obama – ALL VOTERS ELECTION TOTAL
45% McCain, 53% Obama - Monthly church-goers
45% McCain, 54% Obama - Catholics
31% McCain, 67% Obama - Hispanic Catholics
31% McCain, 67% Obama - Hispanic Evangelicals
05% McCain, 94% Obama - Black Protestants


Only 63% of the eligible voters voted. The electoral map shows that, among people who voted, their vote can be predicted much more accurately by their Zip Code (which often coincides with race as well) than by their stated religious convictions.

None of the polls had a category called "Those who hold on to Christ, alone". However I'd wager that you'd find people who self-describe tha way, in every listed category. What does that prove altogether?

Something very much worse than what you think, DutchBoy88. It suggests that voters vote much more by race than by faith. Catholics make up less than 25% of the population, and vote overall almost identically to “All Voters” (a fact of which I am not proud). But with non-Catholic Christians outnumbering Catholics two to one, it would be rather stupid to blame Obama on Catholics.

And then there’s this:

Evangelical Support for Obama Doubles in Past Three Years (Link).

So quit this stupid religious numbers game and...

Let's work together to defeat Obama, OK?

I mean, if that’s what you want.

4 posted on 04/04/2012 11:10:20 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Cui bono?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o

Hey, those bright colors really make your point. By the way, what is your point? The folks I know don’t fit any of those “categories”. But, Catholics need those categories, don’t they.

And, yes, the blacks who vote race (nearly all of them) are wrongheaded for the wrong reasons. They voted for him because he was black. But, Catholics voted for him because they are primarily liberal leaning progressives who love those labor policies, union policies, JFK policies. But, go to Boston and ask, “What do the Catholics want here in the high population cities of the East?” and you will find it is very much in line with Pelosi, Biden, Kennedys, et al. How do you think the liberal dem dynasties get going?

The believers who cling to Christ, alone, (without any organizational props) see that liberalism is a political/social sinful disease similar to communism. If by “evangelicals” you mean the sheeple who trot around after the Joel Osteens, Rick Warrens, et al, these are not folks I would understand as biblically informed. I would put them in the same category as the sappy Catholics who fell for this guy to begin with. Go talk to your group about changing their votes and getting this guy out, not those who never voted for him to begin with.


5 posted on 04/04/2012 3:22:40 PM PDT by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson