[ctdonath2]

He also ended the letter with the non-sequitur “The President’s remarks were fully consistent with the principles described herein.”

To wit: “2+2=5”.

[NRA1995]

"Never mind!"

[humblegunner]

Here’s what Holder had to say: “The power of the courts to review the constitutionality of legislation is beyond dispute.” .

That's all he had to say? Or do you expect a blog hit to reveal the rest?

It's not as if anyone couldn't look it up. You just want
blog hits for the ripped-off information you found. Shame on you.

[max americana]

Holder: “and that America has 57 states, exactly like what the president said.”

[FlingWingFlyer]

Holder a lawyer! ROTFL!!!

[esquirette]

Maybe he was supposed to write it on the blackboard 100 times.

[PA Engineer]

Thanks for the post. I was trying to find the letter in response. BTTT.

[Larry Lucido]

landsbaum

mark landsbaum

landsbaum

mark landsbaum

Will the real pimp please stand up?

[Tublecane]

“ordered the Obama Administration to submit a three-page, single-spaced paper”

That was at least three pages, I believe. Which I think was nothing but a dog and pony show, though it is funny. The only problem I have is that the judge is free to specify format—if he wants it single-spaced, let him have it—but I don’t understand why he gets to dictate a minimum length. He’s not their law professor; if the administration can explain itself in less than three pages, so much the better. Lord knows too many words have been wasted on the law.

[Sirius Lee]

That steaming bag of Holder couldn't help himself. He could have just left it at, "yes, the Supremes rule over Constitutionality." and left it at that, but nooooOOOOOOoooo, he had to prattle on about how it is the tradition that anything that Congress passes is assumed to be Constitutional.

I hope the judge make's the steaming pile of Eric write the whole thing over again.

[garjog]

Check out my blog for more Obama outrages: The Obama Clarifier http://obamaclarifier.blogspot.com/