[VTenigma]

ping

[RetSignman]

How could this happen? Just take about an hour and a half of your life to see the process:

http://t.co/Y8sZiQEs
http://t.co/g97gV59i
http://t.co/sqzQOn0F
http://t.co/TaS97txB

[Richard from IL]

For later reading

[popdonnelly]

President Obama has been a life-long beneficiary of affirmative action. That includes his Nobel Peace Prize.

[kabumpo]

I love what you posted, but he was the president of the law review, not the editor.

[bgill]

Not my president.

[pepsi_junkie]

You know, I think if the court looks like it is going to go the way of striking it down, if I were Elena Kagan I might seriously consider voting with the majority to overturn it.

She sits in a cloud now, as Obama's lawyer she prepared the defense of this thing and then refused to recuse herself. It looks bad, makes her look like a partisan hack. She's even been accused by whisperers of feeding Obama inside info from the close door deliberaitons. In other words, she's viewed as his puppet.

If her vote was necessary, I'm sure she could live with that. But if her vote is not relevant, why not put that all aside by going against Obama? Not only would she remove the appearance of partiality, she would actually appear to be very independent, not a predictable hack at all.