Barack Obama blackmailed by Vladimir Putin, betrays United States and her Allies

I agree. If Obama were to lose, his background would be exposed, the Democrats would be exposed as traitors as would be the Media. There is no way that will be allowed to happen. We are near the end.

it doesn’t matter if Obama gets another four years as long as we take the Senate and hold the House,

I don't buy that, and it pains me to hear (read) people on FR say that.

Do you have a theory as to why CJ Roberts swore in Obama TWICE when he surely knew that O was not a NBC? Wouldn’t the place to have stopped all this should have been between the election and the Inauguration?

I believe he was told if he balked the Soros communist-Islamist alliance would make another run on the bank so he didn’t think he COULD stop it. Same with Dick Cheney. My thought is that both those guys grudgingly played the role they were supposed to because they thought they had no other option - but as they were being dragged away by the witch they left some breadcrumbs for us to follow to show they were under duress.

Dick Cheney never asked for objections to the electoral counts from the states. That’s 50 procedural errors that rendered the declaration of the electoral winner non-legal because it didn’t conform to the requirements of the statute. A technicality that left an opening for a lawsuit to overturn the whole thing if we ever got the gun away from Soros.

John Roberts did what no SCOTUS Chief Justice has EVER done, much less when he knew it would constitute an ex parte meeting in one or more lawsuits - he invited Obama to the Supreme Court. We’re told that’s happened before but the invitation has never come from SCOTUS. The kicker about this is that the news about the invitation being extended to Obama came out on the very day that the SCOTUS was conferring over Donofrio’s case, on Friday. We learned on Monday that they didn’t agree to hear Donofrio’s case, but Roberts made sure that EVEN AS THEY WERE CONSIDERING OBAMA’S ELIGIBILITY the public was aware that they were making arrangement for an unprecedented ex parte meeting - since other cases were pending for SCOTUS to also confer about.

I believe that Roberts was told the threat shortly before the Donofrio conference. If you remember there was the obfuscation and trouble from Danny Bickel, the stay clerk of SCOTUS (very, very similar to what happened in the appeals court for Malihi’s decision in GA). Donofrio’s reaction to all that was that SCOTUS was compromised, since they were made very aware of what Bickel was doing and did nothing to alleviate what they knew had given at least the APPEARANCE of impropriety.

I say Roberts inviting Obama to meet with SCOTUS and making that invitation known publicly on the very day that SCOTUS conferred over Donofrio’s case means that not only did they IGNORE the appearance of impropriety concerning Bickel but they actually deliberately CREATED the appearance of their OWN impropriety. Roberts did. Crumbs on the trail.

Botching the public oath and then having no video to prove that a lawful oath was actually administered may have been Roberts’ way to stomach what he was having to do.

There is no proof that either Cheney or Roberts did what was required to install that impostor as POTUS. Both left a technical “out” in case we could get out from Soros’ threats.

Of course, this is my theory. I can’t prove anything. It would explain what we saw though.

October 7, 2000

Oil adds to Alaskans’ ire at island giveaway

Congress ignores legislature’s resolution condemning transfer to Russia

Alaskan legislators, trying to block the U.S. government’s controversial treaty ceding to Russia eight islands belonging to Alaska, now have one more reason to fight — in addition to sovereignty, state’s rights and the fishing industry — namely, oil.

“The issues involve not only state sovereignty over vital territories but also significant national defense concerns and substantial economic losses over fisheries and petroleum,”
said Alaska state Rep. John B. Coghill, R-Dist. 32.

“The U.S. State Department cannot continue to allow further encroachment of Alaska’s states rights and valuable economic resources.”
The Senate ratified the U.S.-U.S.S.R. Maritime Boundary Treaty in 1991, which was then signed by President George Bush. The Alaska House and Senate were never consulted during the treaty’s negotiations, however, and recently have teamed up with the governor to send a strong message of protest to President Bill Clinton, without apparent effect, however.

Alaska is believed to have some of the largest oil fields in the world. Much of Alaska’s oil cannot be pumped, however, because of wilderness designations placed on much of Alaskan land, said Coghill, who believes access to vast oil fields may now be lost to Russia if the transfer is not reversed.

Earlier this year, WorldNetDaily reported that, according to national security advisers on Capitol Hill, oil ministers from OPEC nations had quietly confided to them that oil production cutbacks — and resulting price increases — had been implemented at the request of the Clinton administration on behalf of Russia, Indonesia, Mexico and Iran.

The idea was that higher oil prices would help Russia, a major oil exporter, to generate funds to get out of massive debt and rebuild the Russian economy. Carl Olson, chairman of State Department Watch, a public interest group, agreed that Russia benefits greatly from the increase in gasoline and oil prices.

Olson said:

“Russia is one of the largest oil-producing nations in the world. Guess who’s benefitting greatly from this run-up in oil prices? The Russian oligarchs in Moscow who stick all their money in Swiss bank accounts. They love this thing. They’ve got giant lobbyists in Washington.
If you look at the worldwide scheme of things in terms of production and oil purchasing, there’s been a gigantic leap up in prices for no good reason for the American consuming public. What we have to do is look at who’s getting rich in all of this — big oil companies and big governments.”

Oil, oil everywhere

“Think about this,” said Olson.

“If you had just one island with only one square mile and you drew a 200 mile circle around it, do you know that’s 125,000 square miles of potential sea bottom for oil exploration? It’s totally anti-public, anti-Congress, anti-state actions — but unfortunately the State Department thinks it has the power to adopt this boundary line with the Russians without anybody’s consent outside themselves.”
Coghill sponsored Alaska H.J.R. 27, a resolution that was passed in the state’s House and Senate then enacted by Alaska Gov. John Knowles in 1999. It was intended to “require the federal government to begin a new dialogue with Russia over the disputed maritime borders, insuring that Alaska is sitting at the negotiating table, as well as prevent the impending giveaway of eight Alaskan islands,” said Coghill. A resolution is not binding, but rather expresses the will of a legislative body, so the Alaska resolution isn’t binding on Congress. “They have not responded in any way,” Coghill said.

Negotiations between the State Department and the Soviet Union began in 1990 when a proposed treaty agreement was drafted. The federal government has honored that agreement — which changed boundaries — even though it has never been fully ratified and the Soviet Union no longer exists. “It’s an unratified treaty with a non-entity,” quipped Coghill.

The United States-U.S.S.R. Maritime Boundary moved the line between Russia and Alaska in such a way that eight islands that were specified as part of Alaska when it was purchased from Russia would become part of Russia once again. The State of Alaska was not included in the negotiations at the time of the agreement, or at any time since, complains Coghill.

“There were representatives of the Fish and Game present to answer questions, but there was never any opportunity for input.”
Coghill’s resolution demands official representatives from Alaska be present and have authority to participate in any further negotiations.

The agreement transfers to Russia the islands of Wrangell, Herald, Bennett, Henrietta, and Jeannette Islands in the Arctic, and Copper Island, Sea Lion Rock, and Sea Otter Rock on the west end of the Aleutian chain. The problem, say Coghill and his colleagues in the Alaska legislature, is that it gives Russia access to vast oil and fishing areas without any compensation to Alaska.

There has been a long history of disputes over which country owns the islands, particularly Wrangell Island, which is about the size of Rhode Island and Delaware combined. According to credible reports, Russia used it for a concentration camp until recently.

Alaska claims the islands on the basis of the original sale agreement for Alaska and other transactions. The U.S. purchased Alaska from Russia in 1867 and the sale included all Aleutian Islands, including Copper, Sea Otter Rock, and Sea Lion Rock. In 1881, U.S. Capt. Calvin L. Hooper landed on Wrangell Island and claimed it for the U.S.

Also in 1881, the U.S. Navy claimed the islands of Bennett, Jeannette, and Henrietta. The British held Herald Island, but they gave up that claim permitting the U.S. to take it. Russia’s claim over the boundary may soon reach a court of law.

“Just last week we boarded a vessel that crossed the boundary — and that’s going to be disputed,” said Coghill, referring to a Russian ship that was recently stopped in waters claimed by Alaska. The action may take the boundary dispute out of the hands of politicians and place it in the courts.

Have the islands been handed over to Russia yet by the U.S. government? “That’s not an easy answer,” said Coghill. “There has been an acquiescence to Russia, yes. There has been no extinquishment of any legitimate claim that we (Alaskans) might have. It has been blindly ignored by our Congress.”

Secret agreement

On June 1, 1990, then-Secretary of State James Baker signed a secret executive agreement with Eduard Shevardnadze, the former U.S.S.R. foreign minister. It specified that even though the treaty had not been ratified, the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. agreed to abide by the terms of the treaty beginning June 15, 1990.

Coghill said the existence of the agreement, which is described in his resolution, is now well known by Alaskan and U.S. elected officials. At the time the treaty was presented to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, however, the existence of the secret agreement was not made known, he said. Although the Senate ratified the treaty and President George Bush signed it in 1991, the Soviet Union never ratified it, nor has Russia. Russians have always claimed they did not benefit enough from the boundaries offered in the treaty.

The State Department is engaged in negotiations with Russia to change the boundaries specified in the unratified treaty even further, claims Coghill, who further says he doesn’t know the status of those negotiations because the State Department is not responding to Alaskan officials on the issue.

Russia is asking to move the boundary line in such a way that an additional 40,000 square miles of ocean and seabed would belong to Russia. That would yield 300,000 pounds of fish per year — fish that are normally harvested by Alaskan fishermen. If the transfer were made, Alaska would not be compensated for the loss, according to Coghill.

Alaska’s resolution demands new negotiations start back at the beginning, before the treaty was formed. “Along with the maritime issue, this needs to be discussed as well. Alaska needs to be in on it because, number one, it’s a significant part of the fishing part of the world. Secondly, we have a legitimate historical claim that has not ever been addressed,” Coghill said.

The resolution demands that: the Clinton administration start new negotiations. Alaska be a full participant in any negotiations with Russia. The State Department stop all negotiations that give fishing rights to Russia Illegal acts involving the effort to transfer land to Russia be prosecuted.

Although the resolution has been in the hands of Clinton, members of Congress and the State Department for more than a year, it has been ignored, Coghill says. The California legislature unanimously passed a resolution in support of Alaska in 1991, asking U.S. senators from California not to consider the treaty until Alaska “has been able to participate fully in negotiations and has been guaranteed that its consent will be required for any agreement affecting its boundaries.”

Coghill hopes U.S. citizens will call on their state legislatures to approve similar resolutions, saying all states should be concerned “because if they can do this to Alaska, they can do this to any state.” Olson said the U.S. government has prevented oil companies from drilling by declaring areas of

Alaska and other parts of the U.S. as wilderness areas. But the U.S. has more than enough oil to supply its own needs and export oil as well, he says. “The wholesale price of gasoline today is a very easy thing to look up in the Wall Street Journal because they run it every day.

For unleaded standard regular gas it’s $.89 a gallon, but it’s selling for $1.75 to $2 a gallon. Somebody’s making a ton of dough here and it’s split up between the oil companies and the government,” said Olson.

Olson called on all presidential candidates to make a statement on where they stand and what they will do if elected. “It shows whether they are on the public’s side, or if they are on the inside-the-beltway side. Every single presidential campaign has been approached by us and we’re still waiting for them to address this in public.” [end]

I’ve said for years that I would never, ever vote for Romney under any circumstance, but then we got a guy who gets shut down by Congress and just does whatever he wants anyway. I don’t know if it’s inevitable that he’s the nominee, but Obama has to go. Unfortunately, I also realize that a guy the base hates is already deep in a hole, just like McCain.

There's always something unexpected, like an Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria scenario, that could light the candle.

It's hard not to sense that we are heading for something nasty and the surreal feeling of being an observer as two plans unfold: the plans of men and The Plan of our Creator.

As to the US, it's possible to be forgiven, but it's hard to see how we avoid the consequences of what we've made legal and common.

Just a guess, but sacrificing innocent human souls through legalized abortion isn't going to go unnoticed. Moreover, what seals are being/have been broken and what will be or has been set free via such a massive and continuous sacrifice of innocent humans?

Putin threatened to reveal everything about Obama’s gay lovers and his sham marriage to Michelle?

Heck, this would only strengthen his “street creds” in the U.S. with certain groups. That's no threat at all.

I believe you have a very well thought out theory...and it’s actually more than theory since we see this unfolding before our eyes and the pieces seem to fit.

Do you get info from Hillbuzz? I watched part of the movie - what was it called - “we will not be silenced”. So why are Hillary and Bill, who know more than most, meekly doing the bidding of Soros/Obama/Ayers?? Is it because Hillary was an admirer of Alinsky also or is this too far even for her?

My greatest fear is that our votes won’t count and the media will report gleefully that Obama has won 4 more while underneath it all is huge fraud - just the way Obama beat Hillary and took the general - with the lies, coverups and the rules violations for the money he got.

See my tag line. I knew in then in my gut and I know it now by fact.