The Judge DID rule on the scientific merit of “ID”. He ruled it had none. I don't expect you to agree with the ruling - but it is a lie to claim he made no such determination.
Typical that you cannot argue against a scientific theory without arguing against atheism. I am a Christian - why would I hate when the Bible is quoted? The Pope accepts evolution - do you think he hates when the Bible is quoted?
In the free market science is seen to have value - while creationism is useless. That is where science wins - in the market of ideas. Science and knowledge of evolution leads to the discovery of novel therapeutics - creationism leads to no novel therapeutics because it contributes nothing to an understanding of the natural world.
I provided the source for all the quotes - it is typical that you are unable to refute them - or otherwise deal with them. Madison WROTE the 1st Amendment. I could quote Jefferson as well if you wished - but you would dismiss his quotes as well.
I do not hate God, religion or our nation. I am a believer, a Christian, and a former U.S. Airman. But as is typical - you cannot formulate a coherent argument on your own - you need to attack anyone who disagrees as hating God, being an atheist, a communist, etc. You are not God. Those who oppose your ideas are not in opposition to God.
The Judge DID rule on the scientific merit of “ID”.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Oh Wow! A law school graduate ( with a likely B.A. in political science) gets to rule on science. ( eye roll!) ( sigh!)
Repeating what you have stated before in a different fashion is nothing more than the definition of insanity. I leave you to your own destruction.
Goodnight and sweat dreams!