Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H

“IOW, you support continuing a policy that you acknowledge to be in violation of the Constitution. Typical prohibitionist contempt for the Constitution.”

El Wrong-0. I am against selective application of it. All or nothing.


72 posted on 04/19/2012 12:40:06 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Persevero
I am against selective application of it. All or nothing.

I wholeheartedly agree that we should consistently apply the Tenth Amendment. But why can't we allow ourselves to get there one step (for example, medical marijuana) at a time? Must we make the best the enemy of the good?

84 posted on 04/19/2012 2:48:28 PM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: Persevero
I am against selective application of it. All or nothing.

Then you must be supportive of SCOTUS upholding Obamacare, since to strike it down would be selective, rather than all or nothing. After all, it does nothing about federal control of education, the environment, tobacco etc.

87 posted on 04/19/2012 8:24:15 PM PDT by Ken H (Austerity is the irresistible force. Entitlements are the immovable object.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson