I take it you mean “not relieving” :)
The Alexander case is new to me, but I read three stories about it before coming across a CNN article that points out that the husband recanted his affidavit supportive of her actions at the SYG hearing.
He told the judge he conspired with her to protect her in the written statement, but she actually fired at him, when he was with the kids, while he plead for his life.
I’d be interested to hear more than outraged liberal bloggers on the facts in this case. Where did the round impact? That would be a fine place to start, although discharging a firearm to intimidate can probably get you a stiff sentence all by itself. What did the children say happened? Was he a repeat visitor? Anybody drunk or high?
She was in fear for her life, but she went back to confront him, passing several exists, rather than retreating or waiting in the garage? He charged her, but she only fired once in the ceiling? The man involved went directly to the police?
Something’s up, and the judge didn’t buy her version, and a jury deliberated for only a few minutes before finding her guilty.
I’m all for the RTKBA and if a wifebeater legitimately gets shot, no tears here. Applause, more likely.
However, the fact that liberal bloggers and commentators are crying “Racist law!” while giving a redacted version, or only her version, of what transpired at the scene and in court leave me very skeptical.
In the Martin shooting, we are finding out how the libs rushed past all facts to fit a narrative that allowed the play of the race card. What should make us think this is any different?