Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Tribune7
"There are those who want to be holy and pure and feel good about themselves and vote for "pure" candidates without comprehending that it's the one willing to work in the mud that's actually going to save babies and this country and everything else you hold dear."

Speaking for myself, I'm far from holy and pure. (Aren't we all?) I struggle every day to do what's right. But I've prayed about this, and I firmly believe it will be spitting in God's eye if I personally choose an an abortion-enabling, homosexual-loving liberal to lead this nation. I can't do it---I won't do it. That would be going against everything God stands for. But isn't it interesting that, lately, this view garners derision and insults like "You're so pure, so righteous, so holier than thou", etc. All very leftwing in tone, really.

I don't want a pure candidate. I just want a non-liberal without blood on his hands.

55 posted on 05/01/2012 1:16:22 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: CatherineofAragon

And what becomes of God’s Eye when your actions lead to Obama’s re-election? That’s the Obama who couldn’t even vote for a law prescribing medical care be given to abortion victims who were accidentally born?


56 posted on 05/01/2012 1:21:22 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson