Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

“What other conclusion can be drawn from your naming off how many people agree with a position?”
__

I hope most people draw the obvious conclusion.

The fact that every single judge who’s looked at the issue has come to the same conclusion is strong evidence that there is an overwhelming consensus in the judicial community regarding how WKA is to be interpreted. Whether that interpretation is “correct” is a totally different issue, one on which I have expressed no opinion.

I don’t think that’s a difficult concept to understand, and I’m not going to keep repeating it.


57 posted on 05/07/2012 2:24:39 PM PDT by BigGuy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: BigGuy22
The fact that every single judge who’s looked at the issue has come to the same conclusion is strong evidence that there is an overwhelming consensus in the judicial community regarding how WKA is to be interpreted. Whether that interpretation is “correct” is a totally different issue, one on which I have expressed no opinion.

I don’t think that’s a difficult concept to understand, and I’m not going to keep repeating it.

All the physicists in the world had bought into the "Aether" theory until Einstein came along and demonstrated that it was rubbish.

Let me try once more to acquaint you with the fallacy of your presentation.

Argumentum ad populum.

65 posted on 05/07/2012 2:46:26 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: BigGuy22
I hope most people draw the obvious conclusion.

Me too. I hope they come to the obvious conclusion that our Legal system is full of stupid and corrupt people who need to be excised from it as quickly as possible.

The fact that every single judge who’s looked at the issue has come to the same conclusion is strong evidence that there is an overwhelming consensus in the judicial community regarding how WKA is to be interpreted.

Yes, they all seem to be beyond hope. Oh well, a new broom sweeps clean!

Whether that interpretation is “correct” is a totally different issue, one on which I have expressed no opinion.

Again with the lying. Of course you've expressed an opinion. The very act of responding to our comments is intended to express an opinion on the subject.

You see, we find that most people who have no opinion on the subject don't bother discussing it. Those that do fall into two categories. Those trying to protect Obama's claim to legitimacy, and those of us who've actually read the history and the law, and know that he is not a legitimate President.

You have come here to play your sophistic games, and you aren't fooling anyone. I've scanned through your messages. Since you've got here you've done nothing but challenge anyone asserting Barack is illegitimate.

Your style if full of legalistic crap, and closely matches the style of the Fogbow crowd that we have all had to wipe off of our shoes. Give my love to Sterngard Friegen.

81 posted on 05/08/2012 6:09:10 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson