Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BigGuy22
Now look back at what you were responding to -- it was my comment that "your view has no impact on what current law actually is."

And you seem to agree. You are hoping that the law will eventually become what you want it to be.

You are apparently unaware that John Brown opposed actual laws, not Judges opinions of laws. Laws regarding slavery were deliberated and voted on by the legislatures of the several states, and therefore were duly enacted legislation. i.e. "laws."

I am not acknowledging that what judges cause to occur constitutes the same thing as an actual law.

And who knows, maybe it will. All I'm talking about is what the law is now -- which, by your own admission, is not what you want it to be, because you said it yourself -- "we mean to force the laws to change."

I am not confining myself to just this one issue in regards to "the laws." There are many actual laws that need to be changed, not just this widespread misinterpretation of Amendment 14.

59 posted on 05/07/2012 2:30:08 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

Well, it looks like we agree on more than we might have thought. Nice chatting with you.


60 posted on 05/07/2012 2:33:23 PM PDT by BigGuy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson