Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: katiedidit1; Gator113; Marcella; onyx; caww; RitaOK; Jim Robinson; b9

“If Mitt Romney loses, it will be because he failed. He failed to be a conservative. He failed to insist on talking about Barack Obama’s radical associations. He failed to rally the base of the Republican party. He failed to motivate conservatives. He failed. If you want to blame me for a Romney loss, have at it, but I won’t accept blame. Here we have a candidate who saw no problem in hammering his Republican opponents in dishonest ways, but who now shrinks from talking about the truth of Barack Obama, and some wish to blame me?

If you will not call a monster by name in public, why would you be surprised if others will not view him in that light? After all, we elect Presidents because we expect them to tell us the truth even when it’s unpleasant. If we know the truth about Obama, but Romney won’t say it, what could be the justification? At what point does somebody step up and ask Romney: “Why won’t you talk about Obama’s radical associations?” Why, after saying he cannot tell the superPACs that support him what to do, when it came to Newt Gingrich, is he now going out of his way to dissociate himself from any discussion of Obama on this subject by those superPACs? What he’s done is to “call off the dogs” on this, something he refused to do when it came to Gingrich just a few months ago, laughing it off as the nature of politics.”


4 posted on 05/20/2012 8:27:04 PM PDT by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: katiedidit1

“Why, after saying he cannot tell the superPACs that support him what to do, when it came to Newt Gingrich, is he now going out of his way to dissociate himself from any discussion of Obama on this subject by those superPACs? What he’s done is to “call off the dogs” on this, something he refused to do when it came to Gingrich just a few months ago, laughing it off as the nature of politics.”

You know, that’s really a tremendous point.


9 posted on 05/20/2012 8:37:36 PM PDT by Dogbert41 ("...The people of Jerusalem are strong, because the Lord Almighty is their God" Zech. 12:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1

They can blame me right alongside of you.


10 posted on 05/20/2012 8:42:35 PM PDT by Gator113 (***YOU GAVE it to Obama. I would have voted for NEWT.~Just livin' life, my way~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1
Here we have Romney who saw no problem in hammering his Republican opponents in dishonest ways, but who now shrinks from talking about the truth of Barack Obama.

Sounds like a repeat of McCain does it not?..... I can name that tune in one note!

I am not at all surprised Katie....we knew this was coming ....Both sides, which are truly the same side, are feeding the public a line of crap....and they're eating it up.... The public is convinced this is an election between the lesser of two evils.... and the GOP, the supporters, and the reluctant supporters, are pushing the ABO hard and hot. The Piped Pipers have their following now.

Of course I will not vote nor consent to Romney's nor Obama's platform...and comfortable doing so. The fight was in the Primary...we lost....but more than a conservative candidate ....we signed and sealed our nations demise by not supporting those remaining who are conservatives....too late now.

But I've sure enjoyed telling the GOP and NRC people why I'm not voing for Romney.....it is what it is and the GOP and the Romney supporters bare the blame for this trumped up election.

15 posted on 05/20/2012 9:09:36 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1; Gator113

God wouldn’t vote for Romney so I won’t, either.


29 posted on 05/20/2012 11:39:10 PM PDT by Marcella (Romney: for abortion, homosexuality, gay adoption of children - No to Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1

Seems to me he’s not too wise -
with Barry he identifies.
Why else would Mitt not be a man
and fight Obama all he can?

I’ll bet Mitt’s sons could tell a lot
about the kind of dad they’ve got.
They know full well his bully ways;
his tactics, lies and empty praise.

You see it in his grandkids’ eyes —
their empty looks, like props he buys.
Nothing truly joyous there -
I don’t believe they really care.

Not like Newt’s grandkids at all -
Newt shared with them his vision tall.
What has Mitt to offer kids,
but future debt and homo vids?


31 posted on 05/21/2012 12:02:08 AM PDT by b9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson