[Natufian]

Rejected

“We have carefully considered appellants’ arguments and
conclude that these arguments are without merit. R. 2:11-
3(e)(1)(E). We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth
in ALJ Jeff S. Masin’s thorough and thoughtful written opinion
of April 10, 2012, as adopted by the Secretary on April 12,
2012.”

http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/a4478-11.pdf

[jdirt]

Well I guess ordinary rules of law do not apply to Obama’s eligibility.

On to NJ Supreme Ct!!! On to US Supreme Ct. !!!!

Everyone in NJ please nominate Mickey Mouse on your ballots from now on.

[edge919]

There's nothing like a blanket dismissal that can't even articulate compelling reasoning. Thanks to Freeper Mr. Rogers however for finding an additional Supreme Court legal precedent that Minor v. Happersett, not U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, defines the eligibility clause. Here's the quote from Luria v. United States (1913) ... note this date is well after Wong Kim Ark was decided:

Under our Constitution, a naturalized citizen stands on an equal footing with the native citizen in all respects save that of eligibility to the Presidency. Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162, 88 U. S. 165; Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U. S. 94, 112 U. S. 101; Osborn v. Bank of United States, 9 Wheat. 738, 22 U. S. 827.

Minor v. Happersett defined "native citizens" in the exact same way it defined natural-born citizens ... requiring citizen parents. This would make it 27 Supreme Court justices who agreed on a definition of NBC that precludes the Kenyan Coward™ from being Constitutionally eligible for office.