Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Strident
They seemed to reason that the point was that it’s morally defensible to discriminate and not hire a tattooed applicant, or that the existence of one employed person with a tattoo overturns the author’s observation.

How long until some bleeding heart, feel-good liberal recommends that tattooed individuals become a protected class under ADA or Equal Opportunity acts? Gay - check, fat - check, felons - check, unemployed - check, why not tattooed? I smell a protected class in the making....

24 posted on 06/01/2012 7:15:52 PM PDT by RobertClark (Be prepared, be polite, be professional and have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: RobertClark

There is already such a movement to end discrimination against people with tattoos and piercings in housing and employment. In fact, they even have a name for themselves: “Modified-American”. I like my own nickname better: “Mutilated-American”.

I used to read Revelations about how people would need the mark of the beast on their foreheads to buy or sell and I thought “what idiot would fall for that”? Now I see all the imbeciles who voluntarily put crap all over their faces and necks and realized Satan isn’t going to have any trouble accomplishing that at all.


26 posted on 06/01/2012 7:25:52 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Our economy won't heal until one particular black man is unemployed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson