Posted on 06/13/2012 6:01:55 AM PDT by MichCapCon
On the day Gov. Rick Snyder signed a bill to stop the flow of money being taken from home health care workers checks and handed to the Service Employees International Union, the union signed a contract extension with the dummy employer it helped create to keep the scheme alive.
The contract extension between the Michigan Quality Community Care Council and the SEIU keeps what is now known as the "home health care dues skim" potentially in place through February 2013. Attorney Gen. Bill Schuette ordered an end to the "skim" last month but the SEIU sued in federal court to keep it alive.
Healthcare Michigan, an affiliate of the SEIU, signed the contract extension with Susan Steinke, executive director of the Michigan Quality Community Care Council.
MQC3 was the dummy employer used by the SEIU to net tens of thousands of so-called home health care workers into the union seven years ago. The target of the unionization scheme was the Medicaid checks sent to help provide home care for homebound patients.
Most of those workers had no way of knowing what was taking place and the vast majority were family members or friends taking care of loved ones in their homes.
So far the SEIU has received more than $30 million in dues and other fees deducted from the Medicaid checks.
"Given that MQC3 is being funded by the union it should be no surprise that they made such a last minute deal," said Patrick Wright, senior legal analyst for Mackinac Center for Public Policy. "This extension has nothing to do with keeping a registry in place or helping caregivers. It has everything to do with cash flow for the union."
In 2011, the Michigan Legislature de-funded the MQC3 in an effort to stop the "skim." However, documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request show that the dummy employer was kept alive with at least one transfusion of money ($12,000) from the SEIU and with Steinke running it out of her Okemos home. Adding to the extraordinary circumstances was the fact that Steinke could work no more than three hours a month because she wanted to maintain her unemployment compensation.
Steinke did not respond to questions asking her where the extension was signed; if there were any witnesses; if the signing complied with the Open Meetings Act or other details surrounding the now extended contract.
Steinke did not respond to questions asking her where the extension was signed; if there were any witnesses; if the signing complied with the Open Meetings Act or other details surrounding the now extended contract.
lets hope she slipped up and goes to prison where she belongs.
Unreal. Somebody DOES need to go to prison.
And what exactly does SEIU do for these workers? I doubt any of them make over $12.00 an hour. I certainly couldn’t afford union dues with the little cash in take home pay after taxes.
The old Skim Scam . . . .
They provide kneecap insurance. Stay in the union and your kneecap doesn't get broken.
They don’t do anything for them. The fact is that these people are basically private contractors who are both employer and employee.
As it is the unions are trying to get their “right” to steal written into the state constitution.
I think the union fight needs to come to Michigan where we’re making big strides.
It don’t get much lower than this.
“Labor Group Targets Disabled Rehab Program Participants For Unionization”
http://www.michigancapitolconfidential.com/16967
This is the kind of stuff that used to be pulled only in the dead of night but now the union thugs are so brazen that they aren’t afraid to operate in the daylight. What are the people of MI going to do about this? Any anecdotal reports?
We’ve done a lot but we’re losing steam because we’re ignored. A little national attention might put some steel in the jello spines in Lansing.
So why can’t the rank and file get together and a) vote the leaders out of office and b) vote to decertify? Isn’t it about time that union members wrestle control back from the grifters?
A while back I decided that unions (and especially SEIU) exist primarily as fundraising arms of the Democrat Party.
From what I’ve read, the union set a very high bar to bring such things to a vote. It needs to be something like 90% to even be considered.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.