Skip to comments.
Secrets Revealed (More evidence arises that Obama's birth certificate is a forgery)
American Thinker ^
| 06/15/2012
| Nick Chase
Posted on 06/15/2012 4:38:31 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: itsahoot
21
posted on
06/15/2012 11:37:17 AM PDT
by
JohnnyP
To: SeekAndFind; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; ...
Note that this carefully worded statement does not say that the Bennett copy is identical in appearance to the original record. Nor does it even say that the information in the Bennett copy is identical to the information on the original record. It says "information ... matches." This could mean matching in a generic sense, where the meaning is the same but the wording is not. Or it could indicate that the information on the Bennett copy (the forgery) is a subset of what's on the original record (the forgery has less data), or a superset (the forgery has additional data).
When somebody signs and dates a legal document, customarily a single pen is used throughout -- not three different pens.
What if I am wrong about this? In that case, there are two possibilities: (1) there is no substantive difference in information between the forgery and the real birth certificate in the Hawaii Department of Health file cabinet, and the White House released the forgery to "screw with the birthers"; or (2) the scam is a wider conspiracy involving more people than just employees of the White House -- likely including compromised Hawaii Department of Health employees -- and we can't be at all sure what really is on the genuine birth certificate.
22
posted on
06/15/2012 11:52:52 PM PDT
by
Brown Deer
(Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
To: JohnnyP
Was your answer rhetorical, condescending or confirming? It is in any case, the correct answer.
23
posted on
06/16/2012 2:01:46 AM PDT
by
itsahoot
(I will not vote for Romney period.)
To: SeekAndFind
24
posted on
06/16/2012 2:08:09 AM PDT
by
Dajjal
("I'm not concerned about the very poor." -- severely conservative Mitt 'Etch-A-Sketch' Rmoney)
To: Brown Deer
25
posted on
06/16/2012 5:45:01 AM PDT
by
Hotlanta Mike
(Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
To: itsahoot
It boggles my mind every day.
26
posted on
06/16/2012 2:48:46 PM PDT
by
fireman15
(Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
To: Brown Deer
The stink just won’t wash off even with the strongest soap.
27
posted on
06/16/2012 3:42:30 PM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: SeekAndFind
Sorry, but I find the author’s quite well-researched conclusion to be absurd.
Obama and his handlers have spent millions to keep whatever is in Hawaii’s files secret.
Hushing up an out-of-wedlock birth simply isn’t worth that kind of money.
He as much as admitted they were never married in the book Ayres ghostwrote for him. And remember Michelle’s comment that Stanley Ann was “very single when she had him”?
Suppose an authentic birth certificate were to surface that said what his author proposes. It would not matter in this age of loose morals when 40% of births in the country are out-of-wedlock, and most among those most likely to vote for him.
The author also accepts as fact some things that are most assuredly open to question, like the name of the birthing hospital(if he was actually born in a hospital).
Nope. Not buying it.
28
posted on
06/16/2012 6:53:16 PM PDT
by
Jedidah
To: SeekAndFind
Butterdezillion has verified in a round about way that his records have been amended. I suspect two name changes. Adoption to Soetoro to become Indonesian, then back to Obama. He is hiding the legal adoption and loss of citizenship.
29
posted on
06/17/2012 3:22:56 AM PDT
by
PA-RIVER
To: Triple
Yes. I would like to see an enterprising reporter ask Hawaii why the Sunuhara family was denied access to their own sister's birth certificate. There is no Hawaii law that justifies that.
-PJ
30
posted on
06/17/2012 3:57:49 AM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(If you can vote for President, then your children can run for President.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson