I'm not sure that would work. Reporters are generally exempted from such a liability unless one could prove she knew the document was not legal and intentionally lied abuot it. It would be hard to prove.
I’m not sure that would work. Reporters are generally exempted from such a liability unless one could prove she knew the document was not legal and intentionally lied abuot it. It would be hard to prove.
I thought it this case might be an exception. How could she photograph the same image twice with mismatching photos as the result. She had to know there were two of them.