To: evilrooster
Whats sad is just like the Lewinski scandal or Watergate, its the cover-up thats going to get Holder, not any misdoings related to the actual operation.I'll call BS on this. What they have done is essentially a conspiracy against the Constitution and the American citizens that resulted in the murder of an American citizen/border patrol agent and hundreds of Mexicans. The magnitude of their crimes and deceit guaranteed that they HAD to try to cover it up or be subjected to criminal charges . . . that is if they get what they deserve.
2 posted on
06/21/2012 8:10:21 AM PDT by
RatRipper
(I'll ride a turtle to work every day before I buy anything from Government Motors.)
To: evilrooster
This Republican is looking to jail Holder, if not now, then after the election.
3 posted on
06/21/2012 8:13:02 AM PDT by
pallis
To: evilrooster
Let's remember
where, when, and who started all of this.
Let us ALL remember, Over a barrel? Meet White House gun policy adviser Steve Croley
By Jason Horowitz,
(excerpt) ... On March 30, the 30th anniversary of the assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan, Jim Brady, who sustained a debilitating head wound in the attack,
and his wife, Sarah, came to Capitol Hill to push for a ban on the controversial large magazines.
Brady, for whom the law requiring background checks on handgun purchasers is named, then met with White House press secretary Jay Carney.
During the meeting, President Obama dropped in and, according to Sarah Brady, brought up the issue of gun control, to fill us in that it was very much on his agenda, she said.
I just want you to know that we are working on it, Brady recalled the president telling them.
We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar.
In the meeting, she said, Obama discussed how records get into the system and what can be done about firearms retailers.
Her husband specifically brought up the proposed ban on large magazine clips,
and she noted that even former vice president Dick Cheney had suggested that some restrictions on the clips might make sense.
He just laughed, Sarah Brady said approvingly of the president.
Both she and her husband, she emphasized, had absolute confidence that the president was committed to regulation.
In simpler, pre-administration times, so was the presidents point man.
In Croleys book, he argued that for all the healthy skepticism, in a complex world, regulation still amounted to the least-worst solution to pressing social problems.
4 posted on
06/21/2012 8:13:09 AM PDT by
Yosemitest
(It's simple, fight or die!)
To: evilrooster
I never watch the major network news as it just makes me mad.
I did scan across the channels just to see what they were reporting. Every single one was making false statements to protect Obama.
The common theme was errors and mistakes while trying to do good things. Never mentioned the whole purpose of the scandal. Not a single time. Never mentioned that no effort at all was made to trace the guns and in fact agents who tried to do so were told not to.
5 posted on
06/21/2012 8:16:37 AM PDT by
yarddog
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson