Look Kev, you’re the one who jumped aboard the enemy train and insinuated that ‘maybe Palin just enjoys the money and wealth a bit more than serving her country.’
Quit making yourself right for dumping on her like that. It’s unseemly. Retract it and move on. I know you’re a supporter.
Finis.
Look Kev, you’re the one who jumped aboard the enemy train
***Bull Shiite, bowl sheet, Bu//$#!t. I’m on her train and I’ll be writing in Palin in November. Your hyperbole is a form of straw argumentation.
and insinuated
***Re-read what I wrote. I NEVER insinuated. Those are simple facts about my favorite possible candidate. Your straw argumentation and exaggeration of what I write, however, are the problem here in this round of communication.
that ‘maybe Palin just enjoys the money and wealth a bit more than serving her country.’
***Did I SAY that? Let me look over what I wrote... hmmmm... nope. I did NOT say that. You can argue against stuff I DID NOT SAY all day and it will always be straw argumentation.
Quit making yourself right for dumping on her like that.
***What does this mean? When you support a ‘candidate’ that you only let other supporters say the rosey-cheeked wonderful facts but never address the other things that are obviously there? Is that what you mean? I need you to acknowledge that because my argumentation is against that, and I don’t want it to be straw argumentation like all the bullcrap you’ve been putting out in this thread.
It’s unseemly. Retract it and move on.
***No.
I know you’re a supporter.
***Then I’ll support our non-candidate the way I see fit, and you can support her the way you see fit. Are you going to writer her in come November?
Finis.
***Only if you can let it be finis. It would be a real treat to see a finis to the classic fallacies you’ve been exhibiting.