Why don’t you try going by the where the two little boys came from and who THEY are, instead of looking for what-ever pieces of paper resulted from the clever work of Frank Marshall Davis?
They would have used the original BHO’s name/identity until they reached the hurdle of SAD getting custody. That’s the first forgery if she had to present a bc, which I imagine would have been needed.
How could she show up with the original that might have had a January birthday on it and the name of Ann/Anna as mother?
It’s a one-step-at-a-time process.
And what you have at this point is she’s got custody of a child who has the name of the dark child and the birthdate of Virgina.
You still don’t know who he is, where he was born or who his parents were.
Thanks - makes sense to look at the tangled mess that way. And without seeing exact copies of the original paper trail, who knows???
It’s obvious that he used various ID/s b.c. and dates, as he’s messed up times and dates on several occasions.
Do you factor into the analysis of the two little boys photo the son Richard? Ruth says she named her kindergarten, Madari, using the first letters of her sons’ names. MA for Mark. DA for David. and RI for Richard. Joseph wasn’t born yet, when she started the kindergarten. Who’s Richard?