She’s not smiling, um, because she, uh, couldn’t afford the sweater? Yeah, that’s the ticket.
In the one without sweater it looks as though the eyebrows have been painted on.
Sans sweater hair looks like a brillo pad.
Sans sweater hair looks like a brillo pad.
If we could see the entire photograph rather than a cropped portion, it would be easier to compare the lighting and if others were looking elsewhere or if someone else didn’t have a sweater. It’s obvious this has been cropped because there is another person on right side of the bottom row.
SAD has light on the R side of the fact ut it seems to be a slightly different angle of light, a bit more in the front than the other girls in the top row; the top row girls all have light on the tops of their heads and SAD doesn’t. Of course she is shorter than all the other girls. How tall was she at that time, btw??? Wasn’t she five feet six? That’s fairly tall, those other girls must have been very tall. And what grade is this supposed to be? The girls look to be at least 16 years old, and most girls have attained their adult height by then. Another anomaly that strikes me looking at this photo again is that SAD’s face is quite small in comparison to most of the other girls’ faces. The only two that have faces as small as hers are the bottom very R and L faces. In photos with SAD and other people that I recall, her face is rather large.
Apart from this classic fraud of SAD, mother or NOT, we are growing traitorous people in the establishment of RNC, selling out our country sweeping the Constitution under the rug!!!
http://www.newswithviews.com/JBWilliams/williams200.htm
Just noticed that the girls in the top row have their elbows bent but SAD doesn't. If that's been addressed before I missed it. Almost all the pictures I've seen of her look like they're a cardboard cut-out of herself.