Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred Nerks; little jeremiah; danamco

The only one without a sweater, not looking at camera, not smiling.

1,379 posted on 08/01/2012 11:45:44 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1377 | View Replies ]


To: PhilDragoo
Notice that all the ladies in her row have the sunlight brightening up the right side of their hair and some of the top, old *Stan* no brightening effect.
Interesting.
1,380 posted on 08/02/2012 12:02:43 AM PDT by The Cajun (Sarah Palin, Mark Levin......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1379 | View Replies ]

To: PhilDragoo

She’s not smiling, um, because she, uh, couldn’t afford the sweater? Yeah, that’s the ticket.


1,387 posted on 08/02/2012 3:50:31 AM PDT by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1379 | View Replies ]

To: PhilDragoo

In the one without sweater it looks as though the eyebrows have been painted on.


1,392 posted on 08/02/2012 4:57:33 AM PDT by ABrit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1379 | View Replies ]

To: PhilDragoo

Sans sweater hair looks like a brillo pad.


1,393 posted on 08/02/2012 4:59:23 AM PDT by ABrit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1379 | View Replies ]

To: PhilDragoo

Sans sweater hair looks like a brillo pad.


1,394 posted on 08/02/2012 4:59:38 AM PDT by ABrit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1379 | View Replies ]

To: PhilDragoo; Fred Nerks

If we could see the entire photograph rather than a cropped portion, it would be easier to compare the lighting and if others were looking elsewhere or if someone else didn’t have a sweater. It’s obvious this has been cropped because there is another person on right side of the bottom row.


1,397 posted on 08/02/2012 5:52:46 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1379 | View Replies ]

To: PhilDragoo; The Cajun

SAD has light on the R side of the fact ut it seems to be a slightly different angle of light, a bit more in the front than the other girls in the top row; the top row girls all have light on the tops of their heads and SAD doesn’t. Of course she is shorter than all the other girls. How tall was she at that time, btw??? Wasn’t she five feet six? That’s fairly tall, those other girls must have been very tall. And what grade is this supposed to be? The girls look to be at least 16 years old, and most girls have attained their adult height by then. Another anomaly that strikes me looking at this photo again is that SAD’s face is quite small in comparison to most of the other girls’ faces. The only two that have faces as small as hers are the bottom very R and L faces. In photos with SAD and other people that I recall, her face is rather large.


1,401 posted on 08/02/2012 10:18:45 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1379 | View Replies ]

To: PhilDragoo; Fred Nerks; little jeremiah; LucyT; Seizethecarp

Apart from this classic fraud of SAD, mother or NOT, we are growing traitorous people in the establishment of RNC, selling out our country sweeping the Constitution under the rug!!!

http://www.newswithviews.com/JBWilliams/williams200.htm


1,405 posted on 08/02/2012 11:03:19 AM PDT by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1379 | View Replies ]

To: PhilDragoo

Just noticed that the girls in the top row have their elbows bent but SAD doesn't. If that's been addressed before I missed it. Almost all the pictures I've seen of her look like they're a cardboard cut-out of herself.

1,406 posted on 08/02/2012 11:18:26 AM PDT by azishot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1379 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson