Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred Nerks; LucyT; hoosiermama
“You write as if there are TWO ITMES on the record in the archives, is that right? One for Bomford and one for an OBAMA? Can you explain that?”

Correct. The claim is that there is a Bomford item from Australia and an Obama item from Kenya 1961 with similar formats which were fused into the forged Kenya document with the Australian Bomford filing numbers.

This is what the updated version of the article says (update as of 07/23/12):

“It is now supported by the evidence discovered in the BNA that the Bomford document image from Australia was accessed and used by pro-Obama operatives as a template to alter the image of the Kenyan CCRB image in order to make it appear that “birthers” had created a bad counterfeit of a Kenyan birth record for Obama. This was done by Obama’s forgers to create “shell game” confusion among the public and misdirect media attention from the truth that an original, unaltered Kenyan CCRB, which was never allowed to be publicly seen in its original form before Obama’s forgers were able to access and change it, was actually an image of a legitimate document posted by unknown individuals who were known by Obama to possess the document before hand.”

635 posted on 07/25/2012 3:41:08 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 633 | View Replies ]


To: Seizethecarp
That last paragraph reads like crap. Anything AFTER

“It is now supported by the evidence discovered in the BNA that the Bomford document image from Australia was accessed

is garbage.

Let me repeat the question. WHEN WAS THE DOCUMENT IN THE BRITISH ARCHIVES ACCESSED?

643 posted on 07/25/2012 4:10:20 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (DONATE! fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 635 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson