I will copy below a comment I made up the thread, but first I’ll ask you a question.
Do you think that Arpaio and Zullo proved that the birth certificate posted on the White House website is authentic or a forgery?
If you think it is a forgery (as they did prove beyond a shadow of a doubt to anyone who followed their points), then here is my other question to you and anyone else interested in the truth about the man in the WH:
Here is a question everyone should be thinking about.
Now that Arpaio and Zullo have PROVED WITHOUT THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT that anyone can go get a Hawaii birth certificate EVEN if they were NOT born in HI, and even years later, if Stanley Ann Dunham and the Kenyan Obama are the parents, OR if Stanley Ann Dunham and FMD are the parents, why did the forger/s have to make SO MANY CHANGES????? Even if he was born in Kenya to either set of parents?
The forger could have just gotten the regular HI birth certificate and made a few, one or NO changes. Since “fake but real” birth certificates are as easy as pie to obtain in Hawaii, there would be no need for a forgery, or at the most, one little change, if FMD is the father, as some people are speculating. If that was the case, then “African” would not be there, but “Negro”!
There is only ONE EXPLANATION for the multiple layers and other clear evidence of forgery - including the fact that the purported mother’s name is partly ball point pen and partly fine tip marker pen, obviously forged.
The ONE EXPLANATION is that either nothing or very little on the BC is accurate.
IIRC butterdezillion’s research showed that the BC on file in HI was possibly a delayed registration. Up thread when we were looking at requirements to obtain a delayed registation of birth one was application signed by parents...
Notice the s on parents. Both parents.
As bluecat or another of the legal beagles pointed out upthread a relinquishing of parental rights or custody could be done with affidavits.He would NOT have had to travel to HI...
Here we have a reason for the 71 “family business” Christmas of Sr....Was there need of his testimony and signature to obtain the delayed registration of birth for BO?
Yes, based on Mara Zebest’s analysis, which has not been successfully rebutted, IMO.
LJ: “Now that Arpaio and Zullo have PROVED WITHOUT THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT that anyone can go get a Hawaii birth certificate EVEN if they were NOT born in HI, and even years later, if Stanley Ann Dunham and the Kenyan Obama are the parents, OR if Stanley Ann Dunham and FMD are the parents, why did the forger/s have to make SO MANY CHANGES?????”
The “Blaine BC” proved to be a hoax (stray signature strokes outside whited-out areas tied to a known different BC used as a template). But the Blaine BC shows what the true original might have looked like, IMO, sufficient to trigger the entries in the newspaper.
Only a few changes would need to be made to convert a registration of a Kenyan birth by grandparents with an Honolulu address for their HI resident daughter over to a registration of a Kapiolani Hospital birth. The mother and father are the same and the baby is the same, but only the birth location and witnesses are different along with notations that this was a foreign birth.
Thanks to FReeper Danae and her proving that an original 1961 BC could be obtained which the White House knew would be published in Corsi’s impending book on April 27, 2011, Barry's legal team knew they had to come up with a Danae-like, Nordyke-like BC image dated 1961. We have the forged end-product, but we don't know what they started with.
The simple answer is what Tim Adams said and what Neil Abercommie either could find, NOTHING. Everything else is just pure spin and speculation!!!