Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: GladesGuru; MileHi; jcsjcm; jimbobfoster; loboinok

“Individual” in the time of the Founders meant what it seems to mean today - a single person, distinct from a group of persons.

Since the passing of the 14th Amendment and the extension of its reach through rulings like the Slaughterhouse Cases and others, it now ALSO means a human person acting in a corporate capacity.

The difference between the two jurisdictional statuses is night and day. Without corporate capacity, a person has rights. With corporate capacity, rights are replaced by privileges.

So I always try to note its usage, in order to understand what is actually being addressed as the subject matter.

Sadly, it’s usually the opposite of what it appears to be.


8 posted on 07/25/2012 12:00:31 AM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Talisker

Interesting. Yet some of the justices try to parse the English language the way the founders used it — namely Justice Thomas.


12 posted on 07/25/2012 3:23:04 AM PDT by Tallguy (It's all 'Fun and Games' until somebody loses an eye!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Talisker
...it now ALSO means a human person acting in a corporate capacity.

I have not studied this I admit, but I am not and have never been MileHi Inc.

Feel free if you have something to enlighten me. For now I will consider "the people" to mean the body of individual citizens.

FReegards

13 posted on 07/25/2012 8:50:21 AM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson