I agree. Roberts betrayed his own judicial philosophy by allowing the lawyers a multiple choice answer. The fact will always remain that the law was NOT passed as a tax. His name is mud.
The fact will always remain that the law was NOT passed as a tax.
Would you like to be shown that it was presented
as well as passed as a tax?
@ S. 1796 [Report No. 11189]Mr. BAUCUS, from the Committee on Finance reported the following original bill; which was read twice and placed on the calendar
Snip Subtitle DShared Responsibility
PART IINDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY
Sec. 1301. Excise tax on individuals without essential health benefits coverage.
If it was presented as a tax wouldn't it be passed as a tax as well?
Are you sure you know what you're talking about
or do you believe you know what you're talking about?
posted on 07/27/2012 1:22:31 PM PDT
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson