I don’t see much good in the Obama scheme to redirect exports away from the Mississippi, to the West Coast, so that he can export our natural resources to developing countries, where the manufacturing jobs will take place, instead of here. It kills off trade along the Mississippi, and sends it the Northwest, which doesn’t really want new rail lines through their towns and along their coast, for the purpose of benefiting other states and developing countries.
Remember all the flooding on the Mississippi? Well, that wouldn’t have happened if the Obama administration hadn’t reduced dredging on the Mississippi, by two feet. Oh, there might have been minor flooding, but nothing like we saw. Do you think that is reassuring?
Do you think that it is reassuring that Patty Murray has written into the transportation bill, 467 billion for funding the Gateways, like the one that SSA, the company that employs her husband, wants to build in WA State? Isn’t that the same amount that Obama issued the executive order for?
There is nothing reassuring about Obama’s two faced coal policy. There is nothing good about it for the USA. It’s all about the Agenda 21, turning this country into an exporter of natural resources to developing countries, where the real jobs will take place.
My #51 was in response to your #50. If you have any links to provide on the refinery updates you posted, kindly post them for further distribution.