Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: oldbrowser
It was the Mass Supreme Court that issued the order. Romney chose not to disobey it.

The MA Supreme Court merely questioned the validity of the MA marriage law.

Romney CHOSE to go far beyond anything that the court had decreed...and since when do the Judicial and Executive branches have the power to Legislate?

Romney CHOSE not only to exceed the court's self-inflated "mandate" but to overthrow the very principle of our constitutional government.

I call that TREASON.

41 posted on 08/19/2012 7:40:34 PM PDT by lightman (Settling for the "lesser of two..." is still choosing Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: lightman
Here is the way that it happened. If you don't like the man just say so, you don't need to make stuff up. After all we are not democrats, right?

Then came the Supreme Judicial Court’s ruling in November 2003 that same-sex couples had a constitutional right to marry. In its 4-3 decision, the court gave the Legislature 180 days “to take such action as it may deem appropriate.” Opponents of same-sex marriage — citing a quirk in the state’s colonial-era Constitution that gave the governor authority over matters related to marriage — argued that the court’s decision was not binding and urged Romney to ignore it.

But Romney did not want to trigger a constitutional crisis — seeking, his adviser Flaherty said, to be “respectful of the law and respectful of people at the same time.” Initially, he struck a balanced tone with his two-track move to find a legislative solution that would satisfy the court while corralling support for a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. “We certainly have to follow the law, and the Supreme Court has laid down what we must do,” he said on NBC’s”Today” show the day after the ruling. “But in my view, the right action is to follow two courses at the same time.”

But the governor quickly dropped all talk about complying with the ruling. Behind the scenes, Romney advisers worked to come up with ways to head it off, according to those involved. They consulted conservative constitutional experts such as historian Matthew Spalding, who works closely with former Reagan Atty. Gen. Edwin Meese III at the Heritage Foundation.

It was soon clear that Romney could not push a gay marriage ban through the state’s liberal-leaning Legislature. So he helped persuade Republicans to support a compromise amendment that barred same-sex marriage but legalized civil unions.

72 posted on 08/19/2012 7:59:28 PM PDT by oldbrowser (As long as Obama's records are sealed, any discussion of Romney's past is off limits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson