Touching up photocopier artifacts is reasonable and doesn’t mean the document was forged. To be forged implies someones BC was used as a base and then had select fields overwritten with hussein family data. I’ve seen no evidence that entire fields were overwritten.
what?
Why correct a spelling from an official Huwaii document? Maybe that’s why he has shied away from releasing his BC because he’s embarrassed it has a spelling error on it?
“I’ve seen no evidence that entire fields were overwritten.”
Well, then you haven’t looked at the AP version or watched the video about it. Bty, changing the spelling of words is not, “Touching up photocopier artifacts”.
“I’ve seen no evidence that entire fields were overwritten.”
So, I’m guessing you didn’t watch the Arpaio press conferences, eh?