Posted on 09/27/2012 6:15:44 AM PDT by sussex
Only deep down towards the end of the piece, however, does the fearless BBC offer up a by the way, please move along, nothing to see here factoid
During the trial there were demonstrations by far-right groups after it emerged that white girls were being exploited by the gang, eight of whom were of Pakistani origin, with another from Afghanistan. OMG those crazy far-right groups with their racist agenda
.take to the hills
oh, wait a minute However, Greater Manchester Police said that there was no racial element to the case. It said that the main issue was older men exploiting vulnerable young women and girls. Phew, thats a relief. It wasnt because of their cultural background
.it was because they were older men. Its not race/culture its age/gender.
(Excerpt) Read more at theagedp.com ...
Why not post it here?
Opposing dirty old men who prey on young girls (or boys) is intolerant and racist? Who would have guessed 20 years ago that we would fall so far and so fast?
A school teacher in the UK ran away with a 15 year old girl and nobody thinks its a big deal.
Britain desperately needs to break the media monopoly, with even a weekly small newspaper that would reject their media’s euphemisms with objective reporting.
For example, if someone is a Muslim immigrant from Pakistan, call them that, instead of calling them an “Asian”, which is almost a meaningless term, intended to deceive the public as to their religion and country of origin. No, they are not a Hindu from India, or a Buddhist from China, or a Russian Orthodox Christian from Siberia, or a Shintoist from Japan, etc.
They are a “Muslim immigrant from Pakistan”, or a “British born Muslim whose family is from Pakistan.”
Why does this matter? Because if you look at the police blotters and prisons of Britain, there are virtually NO other “Asians” than “Muslim immigrants from Pakistan” and “British born Muslims whose family is from Pakistan” in there. And their prisons are bulging at the seams from such as them.
It is reasonable for the public to know if there is a major group of people involved in anti-social activities directed against them.
And just a single newspaper refusing to lie to the public to further the deception broke the embargo on the truth, it would be a tremendous service, and very profitable enterprise, based on the simple logic that “If they would lie to you in one way, can you assume they are telling you the truth in any way?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.