Why does caring for Barack Obama’s family cost taxpayers 24 times as much as caring for the British royal family?
The Daily Caller reports:
Taxpayers spent $1.4 billion dollars on everything from staffing, housing, flying and entertaining President Obama and his family last year, according to the author of a new book on taxpayer-funded presidential perks. In comparison, British taxpayers spent just $57.8 million on the royal family.
That is an absolute disgrace.
The article continues:
Obama has 469 senior staffers and 226 are paid more than $100,000 a year
A president who believed in constitutionally limited government would never do that.
The article also states:
The president has a full-time movie projectionist in the White House theater: Projectionists sleep at the White House and are there 24 hours a day in case anyone needs to see a movie.
Apparently, the person who is trusted to keep their finger on the button that activates the nuclear bombs is too incompetent to operate a DVD player.
The article also says that taxpayers spend $102,000 per year on a “dog handler” for Obama’s dog. The President already receives a personal salary of $400,000 a year – why can’t he spend his own money on a “dog handler”?
For more examples of horrible things that Obama has done, please see my earlier post Here are 95 examples of Barack Obama’s lying, lawbreaking, corruption, and cronyism.
cause they are mere Royals... the boy thinks he's a DEITY!!!