Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel

I am read the opinion. It states there are only two citizens. There is no discussion at all to the “birther” issue. It is in the link.


19 posted on 10/01/2012 6:31:37 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory

And that’s what I’m really saying too only 2. Those naturalized and natural born.

Naturalized citizens also include citizens born under the aegis of the 14th Amendment, and all others are natural born citizens.


21 posted on 10/01/2012 7:03:40 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: longtermmemmory
I am read the opinion. It states there are only two citizens. There is no discussion at all to the “birther” issue. It is in the link.

A legal opinion which says the 14th Amendment did not repeal Article II, is ground zero of the "birther" debate. We "birthers" have been saying all along, that 14th amendment citizenship is not the same thing as "natural citizenship." Natural citizenship does not require a 14th amendment.

If you have to rely on the 14th amendment to be a citizen, then you are not a "natural citizen". You are a citizen by the operation of a man made law.

32 posted on 10/01/2012 9:10:56 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson