[Col Freeper]

1) If I were to post pictures of the inside of Jack's house, there would be no way for me to prove to readers that it actually was the inside of *Jack's* house. It could just as easily be the interior of some other house. Such an objection would certainly be inevitable from people who want to believe Gilbert; if they don't trust my account of Jack, they're not going to trust the pictures either.

2) Even if it were conceded that the photos did indeed depict the house at 2994 Kalihi, the next inevitable objection would be that he and I had simply omitted pictures of some part of the house. A particular room, or even just a particular angle of a room. So once again, people would find a reason to conclude the pictures were unsatisfactory.

I don't have a dog in this fight, but in this era of digital movie cameras and YouTube, why would still photos be argued for/against?

A movie starting with the house owner, showing the house exterior and address, followed by a complete house walk-through would be a better product to argue "it's not this house", wouldn't it?

[Tex-Con-Man]

The burden would fall to Gilbert to provide the videos and photos he claims to have, to prove it is the house.