That’s both inaccurate and racist. Only 10% of its 115 million people are Indian, with an incredibly diverse ethnic mix in the rest of the country. Most of the Indians are in central or South Mexico. 76.5% Roman Catholic. 78% live in the cities. An 86% literacy rate, about the same as the US, though Obama’s administration has just announced that the US has a 100% literacy rate.
In Mexico City, there are statues honoring Louis Pasteur and Mohandas Gandhi, museums with Rembrandt and Rubens, and their Metro is the second largest in North America after NYC. They have had a good national rail system about as long as the US.
There are over 370 universities in Mexico, and it is the wealthiest country in Latin America.
Stating the obvious is hardly racist, and as a glance at images of the inhabitants of Mexico will show, a statement of considerable predictive capability.
Culture counts, and Mexico is “Messico” because they have such a different culture from America. Just two basic issue - we are secure in person and property. They are not.
No statistical cherry picking can cover the vast (and increasing) gap between the pool of ever deepening cess that is Mexico and that which America is.
Even after having allowed collectivists to infiltrate our schools, agencies, and most all public offices, the American way is not aceptent of “La Mordita” (Messican for “bribe”.
I will accept the term discriminating, as I most assuredly apply value judgments, but I must reject your hopefully casual/inaccurate use of “racist”.
When Mexico stops acting like the “Indigenous Savages” from whence they are derived, and when they manage not squander what is the 12th largest national income on developing their “inner savage”, I assure you I will be more happy about such positive change than most.
I have seen once idyllic rural communities in America infested with illegals from Central America, many from Mexico. Places like Cresenct City now have MS13 grafitti and the last graduating class was 85% Mexican, as one of the realtors admitted. A drive through the area makes his position unassailable.
Stating the obvious is hardly racist, and as a glance at images of the inhabitants of Mexico will show, a statement of considerable predictive capability.
Culture counts, and Mexico is “Messico” because they have such a different culture from America. Just two basic issue - we are secure in person and property. They are not.
No statistical cherry picking can cover the vast (and increasing) gap between the pool of ever deepening cess that is Mexico and that which America is.
Even after having allowed collectivists to infiltrate our schools, agencies, and most all public offices, the American way is not aceptent of “La Mordita” (Messican for “bribe”.
I will accept the term discriminating, as I most assuredly apply value judgments, but I must reject your hopefully casual/inaccurate use of “racist”.
When Mexico stops acting like the “Indigenous Savages” from whence they are derived, and when they manage not squander what is the 12th largest national income on developing their “inner savage”, I assure you I will be more happy about such positive change than most.
I have seen once idyllic rural communities in America infested with illegals from Central America, many from Mexico. Places like Crescent City now have MS13 grafitti and the last graduating class was 85% Mexican, as one of the realtors admitted. A drive through the area makes his position unassailable.