Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Proposed Rear-view Camera Mandate Would Cost $57.2 Million Per Life Saved
Michigan Capitol Confidential ^ | 10/8/2012 | Tom Gantert

Posted on 10/11/2012 10:10:54 AM PDT by MichCapCon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: cripplecreek
I long for a mechanical window that NEVER fails to roll down and that little vent window that doesn't mess my hair.

I'm thinking about putting those guides on my tire wells. The new granite curbs cut your tires to hell.

21 posted on 10/11/2012 12:01:50 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

If you are getting your car’s tires cut up by the curb while parking, you are doing it wrong.


22 posted on 10/11/2012 1:24:29 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Oh yeh.....:-)


23 posted on 10/11/2012 1:34:34 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DMZFrank

The cost will be far less than the article suggests as you found out... especially as I forsee most cars in the near future coming with a built in screen for satnav or vehicle operation ,,, a simple camera that engages anytime the car is in reverse will be standard soon.


24 posted on 10/11/2012 3:20:43 PM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

I like them too, but they shouldn’t be mandatory.

Here in Canada, the government mandated daytime running lights to save lives, supposedly. So now you get morons driving at night with no taillights on because they see the road ahead illuminated and it never occurs to them to turn on their lights.

The law of unintended consequences in action.

Cheers,
Jim


25 posted on 10/11/2012 4:06:41 PM PDT by gymbeau (Freed Tibet yet, hippie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

I’m not sure why it adds so much cost, or why any company needs government subsidies to “study” how to make these.

You can already buy cars with backup cameras. Most cars that have center dash displays now have options for backup cameras.

I bought a web cam for under 20 bucks, so it’s not like camera technology is a big cost driver.

Not that it should be required anyway, since as the article clearly points out, it isn’t cost-effective. You could find a lot cheaper ways to save children’s lives.

For example, if the state and local government spent the money they were wasting on subsidizing this technology, they could probably improve the safety of at least one major intersection enough to avoid one kid getting run over by a car.

Liberal stupid idea — we could buy every kid a hat with a bright orange flag on it, and require they wear it whenever they walk outside. Then you could see them through your rear-view mirror.


26 posted on 10/11/2012 4:17:41 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson