Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Travis McGee

I read yesterday Petraus, head of the CIA, said it was a demonstration over the video and I read that General Dempsey called Rev. Jones to warn him not to distribute the video. It was on you-tube and Rev. Jones does not have any control over you-tube - the distributor of the video.

This is from foxnews documentating intellegence community (Petraus) was in on the lie:

“Further, an official said, “No one ... believed that the mortars, indirect and direct fire, and the RPGs were just the work of a mob — no one.”

Yet a congressional source told Fox News that CIA Director David Petraeus, during a briefing with members of the House Intelligence Committee three days after the attack, espoused the view that Benghazi was an out-of-control demonstration prompted by the YouTube video. According to the source, this was “shocking” to some members who were present and saw the same intelligence pointing toward a terrorist attack.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/09/27/us-officials-knew-libya-attack-was-terrorism-within-24-hours-sources-confirm/

Here is Dempsey shaking his lying leg:

“WASHINGTON, Sept 12 (Reuters) - General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the U.S. military’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, spoke with Pastor Terry Jones by phone on Wednesday and asked him to withdraw his support for a film whose portrayal of the Prophet Mohammad has sparked violent protests - including one that ended with the death of America’s envoy to Libya... “

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/12/libya-attack-martin-dempsey_n_1878394.html

Who in the intellegence community gave false intellegence on this matter? General Dempsey and General Petraus, just to name two. Did they hide the intellegence from the State Department and President before the attack or did they just lie to everyone after the attack?

Why did they lie after the attack? Were they protecting Obammy and Hillary or were they trying to spin their own pro jihadi policy and stance in sympathy with the enemy from the public eye? They have been killing soldiers with their lies about Islam...putting jihadists on their bases to murder them. Murdering the ambassador through the same negligence/deceipt about Islam, is not that out of step with everything else they are doing.

Their lies are going to get the homeland hit again.


19 posted on 10/13/2012 6:57:39 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: SaraJohnson

Disagree, SaraJ.

Petraeus does not betray his country.

Remember, he has been a target of Soros’ and allies for years.

Please see my posts from #33 on.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2943865/posts


23 posted on 10/13/2012 7:01:12 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: SaraJohnson
Yet we are supposed to trust the CIA that they are on top of the Iranian nuke timetable.

They can't even protect a consulate, and lie to our faces when it's overrun by a military attack.

They even call a terrorist jihad attack in Fort Hood a "workplace incident."

25 posted on 10/13/2012 7:06:36 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson