An illegal gun would be one carried by a felon, an illegal alien, or anyone else carrying without a permit, so I see nothing wrong with this program.
How about just an honest citizen who wants to protect himself from armed muggers in a dangerous neighborhood, in a state (NJ) where TPTB won't "grant" honest citizens a "permit" to carry a firearm, in spite of the clear language of the 2nd Amd?
You would turn that otherwise law-abiding citizen in to the police? Really?
So your neighbor Zelda Armpit pees herself when she even sees a picture of a “gunz”.
You have a permit or other lawful means of moving around with your weapon.
Do you really think Zelda isn’t going to drop a quarter on you ever time she sees you?
What you are saying is that liberal bed wetters actually can tell the difference between a legal and illegal carry. Sorry my man, to a pinko, all gunz are illegal.
The cops will be deluged and legal owners will be forced to hide.
And what about the jerkmoron neighbor who just wants to ruin your day for sh!tz and giggles?
Oh wow, this is just bad, bad, bad.
Rat cher neighbor out, we pay cash!
(and it sounded just as boot-licking the 2nd time too)
I do. The underlined portion illustrates a fundamental flaw in your thinking; in order for a permit to be valid the action being permitted cannot be one that is inherent to man. And example of this: permits to rally or protest -- these are absolutely illegitimate because you as a person have a right to express your opinion. Likewise, the permitting of weapons assumes that a man does not have an inherent right to protect himself.
it could be the permit part that others will disagre with you on, seeing that it turns a right into a govt-revocable privilege, if you can even get a permit in the first place.
Please provide a description of someone carrying an illegal gun...
Of course, if the gun is wearing a ski mask there would be no question when you spot someone carrying or otherwise possessing a gun...