More comments from someone who has not read Keynes writings.
What passes for “Keynesianism” is nothing like what Keynes discussed. He never proposed endless borrowing or continuous deficit spending.
Of course, and cutting taxes at this point would be classically called Keynesianism. Though many politicians would call it such.
The author may be imprecise in attributing the governments fiscal “debts-for-stimulus” and it’s related borrowing and spending in tandem with the cheap money fed policies, as policies that would be advocated by Keynes himself.
The author is not inaccurate in attributing such policies to people who believe those policies are Keynesian.