[Jeff Head]

I believe that somehow, because of all the unanswered questions...because of the unbelievably chaotic and rushed manner in which the Obama administration tried to cover it up...and because of just common sense question, questions like:

1. Why were new security requests for Benghazi denied after two recent attacks, one by an IED in June that left a 40ft whole in the wall?

2. Why were the security teams they had in BEnghazi removed in August, juts a couple of weeks before the event?

3. Why was a U.S. Ambassador who had indicated he rfeared for his life and was seeking more security, sent to Benghazi, the hotbed for anti-Americanism, on the 11th Anniversyary of 911 with o US security team?

4. Why did 12 command centerss watch an attack on Benghazi unflod for SIX HOURS and no relief attempt was mounted either from Tripoli with helos, or from potential US NAvy vessels in the Med? A helo traveling at 150 MPH can go a good distance in 6 hours, so can an F-18 traveling at Mach 1.

5. Finally, what was the relationship of Stevens to the Gitmo Releasess who was heading up anti-Quadafi efforts out of BEnghazi during the revolution? Was Stevens going there to meet him? Was it a setup?

I honestly believe that the terrorists knew that the security had been taken away. I believe they actually hoped to kidnap the Ambassador in an easy smash and grab operation and then try and trade him for the blind shiek, and I believe there very well could have been people in our own government who knew about this.

I believe that the “October Surprise” may have been what was “supposed” to happen in Benghazi.

But because a couple of US Navy SEALS happened to be there on another unrelated matter, and because a couple of other personnel (possibly CIA people) worked with them and put up a heck of a fight...holding them off for 6 hours...that the plan went bad. The attackers got mad when many of their own were killed and wonded and they ended up killing Stevens and the SEALS and the other fellow that got seperated from the main group (who escaped) when they caught them.

Thus what was supposed to be a great “moment” for Obama in an arranged “tough” negotiation to “save” Ambassador Stevens (who himself I believe had no clue about this), turned into a gruesome murder instead.

An American Lament in 2012
http://www.jeffhead.com/lament.htm

Obama’s False Narratives
http://www.jeffhead.com/falsenarrative.htm

The Coming Turnaround in 2012
http://www.jeffhead.com/turnaround2012.htm

[butterdezillion]

Good summary of why there are questions. Both Hillary and Obama should be answering those questions.

[classified]

I agree with all the above being possibly correct. I read earlier on that Stevens supposedly was somehow involved in the coordination of Gaddafi's assassination and I think he was either sacrificed for that reason or somehow this was the October Surprise diversion that went wrong or perhaps both. I do believe that the security was purposelessly reigned back for the events to unfold flawlessly but the Seals created a problem. Rumored that Stevens was sodomized with a stiletto knife similar to Gaddafi while still alive.

How ironic that he would be tortured the same way?

[butterdezillion]

One factual question I have: How many people were around the embassy when it was attacked? There wasn’t a protest, so how many people were there? Realistically speaking, from a special ops and military standpoint, what would have been the options by the time the military people got the live feed? What were the military people urging Obama to approve, that he didn’t approve and went to bed instead?

[Eva]

One more point about the Benghazi attack, the former Seals were there to secure information. There was a lot of information about informants and where weapons had been sent during the “liberation of Libya”, that was stored in the Benghazi consulate, so the fire may have been part of the plan. They were probably supposed to have gotten the ambassador out before they set it, though.