Skip to comments.Obama avoids saying 'terrorist attack', etc, because he risks slandering his religion; Islam
Posted on 10/24/2012 6:10:47 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
The President of the United States of America isn't just a Muslim. Our foreign policy is being driven by a man foreign to everything America stands for. His allegiance to Allah and the 'convert or kill' mantra of the Koran simply is not compatible with everything America stands for. Obama is a dangerous man. His willful sabotage of our economy and foreign policy to weaken us is bad enough, but what's worse is Obama's biggest dirty secret of all (of which there are many)...
Someone needs to expose the the big dirty secret here; That our President is not only a Muslim, but a Muslim who is fomenting Sharia Law throughout the world under the cover of 'Arab Spring'. The label 'Arab Spring' has done for freedom and democracy what the 'Affordable Health Care Act' has done for insurance costs. Both of these things have appealing labels that are also intentionally deceptive ones. How else can the Obama regime get everyone on board with a cause without giving it an appealing name? Beware. America is being duped by a president who's a fraud; A president who uses a stolen birth certificate, stolen social security numbers and a proven forged selective service card shows a clear pattern of deception. He is not who or what he says he is.
We should question everything he says and does, but first and foremost his ongoing refusal to implicate Islamic extremists and even terrorists in his comments. His failure on this matter is deafening and dangerous.
Of primary concern to many Americans is Obama's hesitancy at saying 'terrorist attack', 'terrorist act' or 'war on terror'. Why is this so difficult for our President? Following the WTC attack on 9/11 President Bush made it clear there was a war on terror and reminded us constantly. This gave Americans reassurance that we were being protected by our President and our military. Whenever these terms were used by President Bush, we all knew what and who he was referring to. Obama however, has balked at implicating terrorists or Islamic extremists on numerous occasions. He has intentionally confused and downplayed our war on terror and we often wonder if there even is one anymore.
The most recent terrorist attack in Benghazi underscores Obama's outright failure to say 'terrorist attack', 'terrorist act' or 'war on terror'. The man can't bring himself to do it. Why? America waited and waited for Obama to blame terrorists and he couldn't bring himself to do it. Why frustrate Americans like this? We know it's not because he chooses to "wait before the facts are in" before implicating someone because he was quick to blame a YouTube video and a film maker in America. That turned out to be an outright lie. This is the same man who 'shot before aiming' when he said 'the cops acted stupidly' before he knew the facts. This is the same administration that insists that the Muslim 'Soldier of Allah' at Ft. Hood who murdered 13 fellow soldiers in cold blood committed 'workplace violence' not a terrorist attack. Major Hasan was clearly on a kill mission on behalf of Allah. Where is the outrage at Obama? Obama, please tell us HOW this wasn't a terrorist attack given Major Hasan's Islamic extremist motives as a 'SoA' (Soldier for Allah)?
I believe the chilling answer was revealed during one of his more recent comments. Obama said, "The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam". Does Obama refrain from blaming terrorists out of respect for his Muslim brothers throughout the world? Does Obama view the terms 'terrorist attack', 'terrorist act' or 'war on terror' as an insult or affront to Islam? Remarkably and shockingly, I believe so. Obama's refusal to implicate terrorists can be explained no other way. It was clear to everyone except Obama that Benghazi was a terrorist attack yet from the outset he chose to deceive us. As a diversion he chose to blame a YouTube video and a film maker for causing a protest that got out of control. It has been well over a month since the terrorist attack on Benghazi resulting in the deaths of our Ambassador and three other brave Americans and yet Obama simply refuses to call what happened there a terrorist attack. He wants us to think he said from the beginning it was an 'act of terror'.. However, 'act of terror' describes a man stabbing his wife in the kitchen. After severe delays and silence, Obama has made feeble attempts at satisfying Americans' thirst for hearing our president identify and condemn Islamic extremists and terrorists, but he continues to artfully dodge and avoid doing so out of his allegiance to Islam. During the second debate, instead of saying 'terrorist attack' what did Obama do? He referred back to his Rose Garden statement instead of simply calling a 'terrorist attack' during the debate!! Some of us are too smart to be duped by his clever word games. This man is dangerous and unfortunately has fooled millions of Americans, including some of those working for him, perhaps even Hillary. They continue to scratch their heads in disbelief of Obama's soft ban on mentioning certain 'terror' words slanderous to Islam, but the elephant in the room trumpets loudly and they blindly follow.
Obama's comment "The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam" can be reworded as "The future must belong to those who don't slander the prophet of Islam". Should we, as Americans take this comment lightly? How can we fight a war on terror with a president who makes such a comment? This quote is not only an attack on our right to free speech, President Obama is advocating Sharia Law here. Under Sharia Law, insulting the Prophet Mohammed is a crime, punishable by death. We now know 'Arab Spring' is rife with rioting and violence. We now know reporter Laura Logan was gang raped by 'Arab Spring' participants. We now know that the Muslim Brotherhood is an anti-American, anti-Israel terrorist organization funded by the United States government under Obama's direction. They have associates in our White House with Huma Abedin a personal associate of Hillary Clinton. Should there by any doubt that Obama's secret agenda is to forward Sharia Law in the name of Islam through 'Arab Spring' and that his insistence on blaming an American film maker for the terrorist attack in Benghazi was a direct attack on our right to freely speak and a diversion from 'slandering' Islam?
If you think 'Ohhh that can't be possible' that Obama is an agent for Sharia Law, think again. I ask you to see through Obama's word games and repeat the following until it finally makes sense:
"The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam" -- President Barack Hussein Obama at the United Nations
Imagine George Washington or Ronald Reagan saying that. When we have a president who says something no other president in the history of the United States would say, it's time for concern.. And even worry. Obama's religious affiliation is now revealed. We know he cringes when saying "God" and often omits "the Creator" when reciting the Declaration of Independence. He has crosses removed when speaking at Christian or Catholic institutions. His 'Islam' quote is something no Christian would ever say. But based on the last four years of America's continued decline, we must wonder.. Is Obama another 'Soldier of Allah'?
It is hard to argue against Obama words, Deed’s and his record.
If it walks like a duck. quacks like a duck. looks like a duck. Chances are it’s a duck/
Obama has all the makings of a Muslim.
But does that really matter right now?
What matters right now is to get him and his administration out of power. Get the Muslims out of the Government.
Then get the UN out of America.
The slander is referring to him as a Prophet. So they commit the slander. And the future definitely should not belong to them. OFF WITH THEIR HEADS!
Drop not only “slander” from the title but “risk” does not fit either.
The article is better than the title.
He said , “acts of terror” outside the White House the day after the Benghazi attack.
The reason he doesn’t like to use the word terrorism, is because he doesn’t want his presidency ‘soiled’ with terrorism happening on his watch.
IOW, it’s political, not religious
Read my article. ‘Act of terror’ can be a man stabbing his wife in the kitchen. ‘Terrorist attack’ implicates Islamic extremists and 0bama won’t say it. I agree with the ‘soiled’ aspect but I that doesn’t explain removing ‘the Creator’ from our founding quotes and crosses from religious institutions.
its political, not religious
he’s a marxist
page 261 The Audacity of Hope.
I agree overall. I’m addressing his inability to say ‘terrorist attack’, covering of crosses and omission of ‘the Creator’ or ‘God’ from his paraphrasing of quotes, however.
#1....an act of terror is an act anyone can commit, a terrorist attack is an attact by TERRORISTS.
#2....when he actually made that statement, he was referring to the original 911, NOT Benghazi
“#2....when he actually made that statement, he was referring to the original 911, NOT Benghazi “
I agree. That has nothing to do with the writer’s statement that Obama never uses the words.
“Im addressing his inability to say terrorist attack, covering of crosses and omission of the Creator or God”
Unfortunately, (because he doesn’t believe it & says it for political purposes)) he says God bless America all the time
baraq held several meetings with the muslim brotherhood in the white house this year.
What were the meetings about?
And he did make the statement that he would stand with islam if the middle east gets ugly.
but he’s not a muslim. Just ask his media.
His pronunciation of “Pah-kee-stahn” tells me all I need to know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.