This article gets to a question that few have asked: what were the motives of the attackers. Was this just random act of anti-U.S. terrorism or was it more tactical. Was Stevens specifically targetted? Was the the Benghazi consulate targetted because of its involvement in arms sales throughout the mideast? Who were the attackers, what were they trying to achieve, and who gave the orders to attack?
Here's the logic I see:
Obama and Hillary deliberately enabled the attack. They sent Stevens there, they restricted and denied security, and whent he attack came, they denied help - specifically ordering onsite military assets not to engage up to three separate times.
So, who does this help?
Does it help Obama? Are you kidding? The country is enraged, and it's wiping out his last chance for re-election and actually bringing up the idea of impeachment, if not also charges. So why would Team Obama deliberately do this (because they DID deliberately do this)? Answer: they didn't. Stevens was supposed to be KIDNAPPED. That's why rescue efforts were blocked. But instead, he died - and know all hell has broken loose against Obama.
But who was the other main player? Hillary. Who comes out on top politically, if Obama goes down for this? Hillary. Who has the power to have engineered no escape - or certain doom - for Stevens? Hillary. Who would be the next Rat presidential candidate if Obama goes down for this? Hillary.
These are just facts - not even argument.
The only question is, are you looking at coincidence?
Or calculation?