I don’t know why it is about money.
In post 29 I was showing that limiting the number of items purchased is common, routine, everyday, so gouging is not the only way to limit purchases by an individual(s).
It’s about money because that’s what the original article is defending, charging more as a form of rationing. Rationing in these situations is good. Charging 5 times as much isn’t rationing, even though the article (and people defending that position) thinks it is.