Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: madison10

It’s not mandatory, they just ask real nice and are more than willing to take ‘no’ for an answer in Michigan

That’s what the chart says fwiw


8 posted on 11/08/2012 9:14:00 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Reaganite Republican
It’s not mandatory, they just ask real nice and are more than willing to take ‘no’ for an answer in Michigan

That’s what the chart says fwiw

In PA the Republicans planned to change from the unit rule to the “per-congressional-district” rule for selecting Electors. The Democrats counter offered to support photo ID instead. Naturally, the Republicans fell for it - and just as naturally, the Democrats sued to keep the law from taking effect until after this election. The rule being “jam tomorrow, and jam yesterday - but never jam today.”

The Republican state legislature should now amend that law, IMHO, to require that the “per-congressional-district” rule be instated, at least in any presidential election in which the photo-ID rule is not enforced.


31 posted on 11/08/2012 12:49:32 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which “liberalism" coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson