Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: Free ThinkerNY
Was there anything that wasn’t held back to protect him until after the election?
2 posted on
11/10/2012 1:11:08 PM PST by
bgill
(We've passed the point of no return. Welcome to Al Amerika.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Well DUH. All that effort to keep it hidden for nothing though. Obama voters do not CARE if he screwed an under age midget on the white house lawn while setting puppies on fire. They are low life takers who wanted to keep their perceived gravy train of Federal hand outs rolling coupled with extreme white guilt of not blaming the poor black man for the evil white man’s problem (Bush did it).
To: Free ThinkerNY
Ought to be a law against it and I think there is. Just another expansion of Obama’s watergate. Can’t wait until this corrupt marxist usurper is frog marched out of the W/H.
4 posted on
11/10/2012 1:12:10 PM PST by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Of course. The Washington compost had an article detailing the Petraeus story. Supposedly, all of this was presented to James Clapper, Petraus’s boss 2 weeks ago. He reportedly demanded Petraeus’s resignation...but it did not occur until today...conveniently missing the election and over the weekend also to limit its impact on the news cycle.
5 posted on
11/10/2012 1:13:56 PM PST by
3Fingas
(Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Governmental agencies are supposed to be run at the field level outside political influences. Purposely withholding information consitutes as in this case a misleading of the American public by not disclosing one addtional bit of malfeasance and incompetence. It also help keep the Bengazi story off the front page.
To me this may have criminal implications of coverup.
6 posted on
11/10/2012 1:15:21 PM PST by
catfish1957
(My dream for hope and change is to see the punk POTUS in prison for treason)
To: Free ThinkerNY
7 posted on
11/10/2012 1:15:21 PM PST by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: Free ThinkerNY
That’s because Obama was blackmailing Beytraus to toe the party line,
Or worse, create the party line about the video lies that the rest of the
Hacks were spouting.
To: Free ThinkerNY
FBI Source: Petraeus Case Held Until After Election to Not Hurt Obama Politically
So was news about the Iran drone attack, Valerie Jarrett's negotiations with Iran; and the Benghazi inquiry and reporting.
People kept waiting for the other shoe to drop with this administration until we realized it's a centipede.
10 posted on
11/10/2012 1:17:45 PM PST by
newheart
(The greatest trick the left ever pulled was convincing the world it was not a religion.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
FBI agents learned of the affair while monitoring Petraeus emails out of concern that the woman, Petraeus biographer Paula Broadwell, may have had access to his personal account, the Associated Press reported. So... why wasn't Petraus' security clearance revoked immediately upon learning this information by the "Chumpmander In Chief?" Oh, I see, it wasn't revoked for political reasons. There is nothing that possibly could have been compromised for those few days.
13 posted on
11/10/2012 1:21:16 PM PST by
missnry
(The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals crazy!)
To: Free ThinkerNY
do I really have to say it???
14 posted on
11/10/2012 1:21:26 PM PST by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: Free ThinkerNY
So the DO”J” protects al Qaeda, terrorists,
incoming narcomurderers, Mohammed, Korans, and Obama.
The US Constitution? Not on your life, cracker.
19 posted on
11/10/2012 1:29:04 PM PST by
Diogenesis
(Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
To: Free ThinkerNY
The hypocrisy is abundant.
If the model for what the left thinks we should be is European, the Europeans would only wink and nod at these types of shenanigans.
The real reason Petraeus had his head lopped off is because of his military background. That just doesn't resonate with the current Western European mode.
22 posted on
11/10/2012 1:32:29 PM PST by
elkfersupper
( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Only the president would have had the authority to delay the resignation.
23 posted on
11/10/2012 1:38:03 PM PST by
mojito
(Zero, our Nero.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
25 posted on
11/10/2012 1:45:07 PM PST by
Graewoulf
((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
To: Free ThinkerNY
How about all the layoffs? Why did they wait until after the election. If they would have layed off a week before election it would have definitely helped Romney.
28 posted on
11/10/2012 1:53:24 PM PST by
Leep
(Are you smarter than a 7th grade math student and or Barack 0bama?)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Petraeus knew he was having an affair when he was made CIA director a year ago. Did he lie about it when the CIA vetted him or was he given a pass?
32 posted on
11/10/2012 2:01:24 PM PST by
TigersEye
(Who is John Galt?)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Efforts to contact the FBIs national press office Saturday were unsuccessful.Another example of why Washington likes to release bad news on Friday afternoons.
41 posted on
11/10/2012 2:33:02 PM PST by
Brandonmark
(OWCM is The new American Minority!)
To: Free ThinkerNY
As long as you give out “free” stuff you can get away with anything.
47 posted on
11/10/2012 3:04:07 PM PST by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Who first told Obama and when did that occur? If before November 6, then it will be another fine mess for Obama.
49 posted on
11/10/2012 3:10:28 PM PST by
Tau Food
(Praise God. Trust God.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
This and the Iranians attacking our drone. What else was withheld from us until after it was too late?
51 posted on
11/10/2012 3:20:35 PM PST by
TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson