I suspect he was not, and did not become aware of the full picture until recently.
When it became apparent what was really happening, that Obama was aiding Muslim terrorists, Petraeus bailed from the CIA.
The ‘affair’ was public knowledge last July. It has been over for a few months. It is now a convenient means to run from the Obama Administration and the treason that is occurring.
The gun running to drug cartels in the American southwest is, I believe, a cover for Obama and company to supply guns to Marxist activists and terrorists infiltrating our nation. These activities along the southern border are backed by Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez.
Well our government has been purchasing an extreme quantity of guns and ammunition recently!
It’s being claimed that Petraeus was told he had to resign. But the reasons make no sense. If Clinton’s impeachment for perjury and obstruction resulted in no resignation because they were just about - tee hee - consensual sex - then vulnerability to bribes (in order to hide an affair) has nothing to do with whether even the most powerful person in the world should resign from that powerful position, in order to protect the country. If Clinton was not forced to resign over his many affairs, then there is no way Petraeus should be forced to resign over his one. Especially since the threat of bribery could be removed just as easily by Petraeus coming clean publicly - moreso than with Clinton because Clinton had already committed crimes, and as long as there were potential criminal and civil lawsuits he was STILL vunlerable to bribery. Who could bribe Petraeus once he came clean publicly?
If what you’ve said is true, it would explain why the Obama regime is quick to say they are forcing Petraeus to resign - even though it stinks of an attempt to silence him from Congressional testimony regarding Benghazi.
I think Congress needs to probe how this resignation really happened and why, because it may reveal more about the Benghazi cover-up by this regime.
That does not make any sense,IMHO.
If Stevens bodyguards were CIA and its highly rumored they were, even that Stevens himself may have been CIA, than you have to believe that Petraeus was in on it all from the start.
He had to know that the chicago regime asked him to get rid of gdaffi by getting weapons to anyone who could get the job done. Just turned out that the terror boys wound up with the weapons.Assuming that Petraeus was out of that loop is a huge assumption, IMHO.
You and I are pretty much on the same page.
During the Clinton years, Clinton used the CIA as a cover to transfer nuke technology to Iran and other countries.
I have a feeling we are getting a repeat, CIA was being used as a cover to arm up terrorist.