Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SoCal SoCon
Banning sexual activity between two consenting adults is not what I would consider liberty, especially since our privacy is already under assault from the unconstitutional Patriot Act and TSA scanners.

What a totally strange thought process. Marriage is a God created institution between a man and women. Go ahead and pervert what He set in motion, but, do not be belly aching when He has had His fill of what He called long ago an abomination.

13 posted on 11/14/2012 11:16:58 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Just mythoughts

I was responding to a poster who advocated banning homosexuality between consenting adults. Nowhere in my post did I advocate “gay marriage”. There’s a difference between not wanting private sexual activity between consenting adults criminalized and advocating that said activity be promoted by calling it marriage.

The poster to whom I was responding said that recriminalizing homosexuality would put an end to the “gay marriage” movement. I disagree. Homosexuals are only 1% of the population, far too small a number to constitute a significant voting bloc. It’s not just the homosexuals, it’s also the heterosexuals who support them. Banning homosexuality won’t disenfranchise all those young heterosexual college students who support “gay marriage”.


14 posted on 11/15/2012 7:52:05 AM PST by SoCal SoCon (Conservatism =/= Corporatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson