Let’s start with the fact that RuPaul thinks it’s just ducky for Islamonazi Iran wants to have nuclear weapons.
At the risk of having my tricornered hat and fife revoked, is the only country ever to use a nuke, and unnecessarily so, really in a moral position to forbid its possession by others? Especially when some of the ones who already have it aren’t ideal. Morality aside, we wants what we wants. Of course I’d like us to try as hard as possible to deprive Iran of nukes, short of war. But there’s the thing. I’m not willing to go to war, which is the majority opinion I think, and also Paul’s opinion.
As a side note, I think it’s an utterly absurd position we find ourselves in when we insist on screening every nation in the world for worthiness to have a particular weapon. That’s not being World Poluce, even. More like World Hall Monitor, or something. Not even the British or Roman empires had to deal with that. I’d rather have oldfashioned colonies to steal from.
All ad hominem attacks aside now, please name when Ron Paul favored policies that exceeded the Constitution.
But actually, other than reflection and learning, what’s the point? You’re right, Ron Paul is gone.
The Constitution should be the “platform” of the party that fights the ‘rats now and runs against the ‘rats in 2014 and 2016. Do you agree with that?