Setting aside your reliance on the amygdalae as your primary driver (something that sounds like the classic definition of "reactionary" to me) I agree that the populace needs to be exposed to the negative side of the liberal worldview.
Traditionally, the negative side of any currently ruling worldview was the domain of a free press. However, that press barely exists and what has taken its place is an obsequious pack of sycophants clamoring each day for their bit of propaganda to publish.
So how does the true nature of the liberal worldview get revealed? I am afraid, this time, it will require that the agenda of the left become implemented. Not that this has not occurred before many times in history, but the populace of this once free nation has been lulled to sleep. Short of a genuine revival (yes, that kind of a revival), I don't see much to stop the nation from playing out the time-honored script of the left. The assumption of power in the name of "the people" by corrupt individuals who very quickly oppress those they claimed to be freeing, followed by prison and/or death to dissenters, and, eventually, revolution. Given the power of technology today, I am inclined to expect those deaths to be in the millions and the likelihood of a successful revolution slim.
I think ideologues are, by definition, reactionary, even if they might temper this with a subsequent logical examination fo things.
>So how does the true nature of the liberal worldview get revealed? I am afraid, this time, it will require that the agenda of the left become implemented.
I cannot argue with any of the rest of your post. I just hope as we head there, perhaps somebody in power will hear what I am saying - that aggressive denigration of Leftism now might avert the real world agony which is coming.
Thank you for the comment.