Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Renfield

Pro-dopers in Support of this NY Slimes crapola arriving in 5, 4, 3...


3 posted on 11/28/2012 1:02:07 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Responsibility2nd
Pro-dopers in Support of this NY Slimes crapola arriving in 5, 4, 3...

Proud of your self, Jackboots2nd, that you and Zero are on the same side of this issue? You and the head of the Choom Gang - "gotta lock up them maggot-infested, dope smokin' FM types. doncha know".

Leftist Authoritarians and Drug Warriors - freedom-hating "progressive" birds of a feather.

5 posted on 11/28/2012 1:10:04 PM PST by bassmaner (Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

......2, 1... ME!

I’ve tried marijuana once, and it was miserable junk. I’ll never touch it again. I suppose it addles your brain, fries your lungs, and makes you an unmotivated lump of junk.

But prohibition has failed by every measure I can think of. In Oregon and Washington, anyone can get MJ any time they want. It’s everywhere.

The primary beneficiaries of prohibition are murderously dangerous Mexican drug cartels who earn between 30% and 50% (estimates vary) of their profits on MJ. I had to carry a 9mm on my hip on innocuous hiking trails in Oregon so that I could protect myself, not from wildlife, but from drug gangs.

I want Midwestern Farmers to grow it for profit at a low price. I don’t want it taxed. I want it stigmatized like alcohol and drunk driving.

We’ve mainly created a massive class of dangerous drug runners with prohibition. People will find a way to addle their brains. The question is, shall we also create hundreds of thousands of dangerous drug runners while that happens?


9 posted on 11/28/2012 1:20:33 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (Working is for suckers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

One doesn’t have to be a doper to realize that the state level is where this issue should be decided, and one must be on some brain-deadening substance to claim that the Constitution gives the Feds the authority to ban intoxicants in intra-state commerce.


24 posted on 11/28/2012 1:45:00 PM PST by Daveinyork (."Trusting government with power and money is like trusting teenaged boys with whiskey and car keys,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson