Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: zeebee
Gallups, a former LEO not unlike Sgt. Friday, IMO, is discouraging speculation that it is Trump by saying that the VIP is 1) surprising (Trump would not be) and 2) is “constitutionally qualified to challenge” (which Trump is not).

Trump could certainly pile on or be financially behind some aspect of this. After all, Barry “takes names” and Trump took a shot at “the King” and missed, so if Trump can finish off Obama he will certainly be safer from retaliation.

11 posted on 12/07/2012 10:01:14 PM PST by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Seizethecarp

Who would be “constitutionally qualified”? Mitt Romney?
He courts have said no one so far has standing.


17 posted on 12/07/2012 10:12:44 PM PST by zeebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

...”constitutionally qualified to challenge”....

OK, lets see, what office or position would be able to issue a challenge under the constitution?

An elector?

The person who signs the nomination eligibility sheet?

A member of Congress?

The other party’s nominee/the loser of the election?


20 posted on 12/07/2012 10:15:36 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

the VIP is 1) surprising and 2) is “constitutionally qualified to challenge”.

A high placed judge?


43 posted on 12/08/2012 5:54:31 AM PST by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson