Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: GingisK

No, it has not been debunked. Here is what I posted over at the link you gave (I tried to find Orly’s comment on her site so I could correct her but couldn’t find it):

This is Butterdezillion, the source of this story. My blog is at http://ww.butterdezillion.wordpress.com

Yes, it is for real. Attorney Larry Klayman sent a letter to DNC Attorney Bob Bauer explaining the legal reasoning and documentation for it, which was also confirmed as legitimate by Mario Apuzzo and Larry Elgin. The Mississippi Democratic Executive Committee also showed by their actions that they understood Onaka to have confirmed a non-valid record, because their verification request was specifically fashioned to work with a non-valid BC as well as a valid one. You can see what Klayman said at http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/complete-klayman-letter-to-bauer.pdf

The media didn’t show the actual application that Bennett sent, or the laws which govern Onaka’s response, so they reported the exact opposite of what Onaka actually did. Bennett requested that Onaka verify that Barack Hussein Obama, II, male, was born on Aug 4, 1961, in Honolulu on the island of Oahu to Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama. HRS 338-14.3 requires the registrar to verify ANY fact submitted for verification if he can certify it as the way the birth actually happened. But Onaka’s verification did not verify ANY of those facts.

Onaka did verify that the claims on the White House image are also on the record they have, so if it was a valid record Onaka would have had to verify all the above. The fact that he DIDN’T shows that the record itself is non-valid.

What was posted by Hendershot was a letter to Congress that I posted on my blog and at Free Republic. Redacted from it is a link to an affidavit that I filed for a criminal complaint against DNC Counsel Bob Bauer. That affidavit has all the documentation to prove the claims I made. I kept that link private because my affidavit has contact information for colleagues who worked with me to acquire the documentation. The Congress members would have access to that proof so they could see that these claims are well-documented and substantiated. Unfortunately, when this was posted it had no attribution to it and so people had no idea where it came from or what it was based on. Check out Klayman’s letter to Bob Bauer and you will see why this is true.


47 posted on 01/03/2013 4:38:15 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion
No, it has not been debunked.

Thank you very much for your reply. Now I hope and pray that it makes some difference. Our judicial system isn't feeling too well these days, and is a good match for our useless Congress.

52 posted on 01/03/2013 5:07:37 PM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson