Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/05/2013 2:04:20 PM PST by thepoliticalcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: thepoliticalcom
Barack Obama + Muslim Brotherhood + U.N. Agenda 21 = Obama administration
2 posted on 01/05/2013 2:07:35 PM PST by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thepoliticalcom

Here’s the direct link to the video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=iOWHbmQR21g


3 posted on 01/05/2013 2:08:00 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
CNS.NEWS In a legal argument formally presented in federal court in the case of Hobby Lobby v. Kathleen Sebelius, the Obama administration is claiming that the First Amendment—which expressly denies the government the authority to prohibit the “free exercise” of religion—nonetheless allows it to force Christians to directly violate their religious beliefs even on a matter that involves the life and death of innocent human beings.

… The Obama administration is making a two-fold argument for why it can force Christians to act against their faith in complying with the regulation it has issued under the Obamacare law that requires virtually all health care plans to cover, without co-pay, sterilizations, contraceptives, and abortion-inducing drugs.

-The first argument the administration makes against the owners of Hobby Lobby is that Americans lose their First Amendment right to freely exercise their religion when they form a corporation and engage in commerce. A person’s Christianity, the administration argues, cannot be carried out through activities he engages in through an incorporated business.

THIS ALSO APPLIES TO MUSLIMS … The second argument the administration makes to justify forcing Christians to act against their faith is more sweeping. Here the administration argues it can force a person to act against his religion so long as the coercion is done under the authority of a law that is neutral and generally applicable—in other words, as long as the law was not written specifically to persecute Christians as Christians, the government can use that law to persecute Christians. (Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...

4 posted on 01/05/2013 2:13:45 PM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thepoliticalcom

Why in the hell is this country allowing basically one person to destroy it?


9 posted on 01/05/2013 4:12:11 PM PST by crosshairs (They are only assault weapons in the hands of tyrannical governments and criminals. Ban both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson